# Gold v. DiCarlo

> Supreme Court of the United States · April 26, 1965 · 380 U.S. 520

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1101274

## Case

- **Court:** Supreme Court of the United States
- **Decided:** April 26, 1965
- **Citations:** 380 U.S. 520; 85 S. Ct. 1332
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1101274

## Opinion text

380 U.S. 520 (1965)
GOLD ET AL.
v.
DICARLO, COMMISSIONER OF LICENSES OF CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
No. 901.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided April 26, 1965.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.
Jesse Moss for appellants.
Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for DiCarlo, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lester Esterman, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1101274. Public record. Not legal advice.