# United States v. Kenneth Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 14, 2025

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10845647

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 14, 2025
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10845647

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6234 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/14/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6234

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH LEE BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:04-cr-00027-HMH-1)

Submitted: April 10, 2025 Decided: April 14, 2025

Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Lee Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6234 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/14/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Lee Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step

Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. He also moves to

seal the record in this appeal and several of his prior appeals. We deny the motion to seal

the records. Upon review, we find no abuse of discretion or reversible error in the district

court’s denial of Brown’s motion for compassionate release. See United States v. Moody,

115 F.4th 304, 315 (4th Cir. 2024) (reiterating that district court has broad discretion in

weighing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors); United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th 167, 172

(4th Cir. 2023) (explaining standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. United States v. Brown, No. 7:04-cr-00027-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2024). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10845647. Public record. Not legal advice.