# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · March 24, 2025

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10829401

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 24, 2025
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Nature of suit:** Direct Criminal
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10829401

## Opinion text

Case: 24-10829 Document: 42-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2025

United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
____________ United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit

No. 24-10829
FILED
March 24, 2025
Summary Calendar
____________ Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Davionta Dillion Brown,

Defendant—Appellant.
______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:24-CR-32-1
______________________________

Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Davionta Dillion
Brown has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Brown has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

_____________________
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-10829 Document: 42-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/24/2025

No. 24-10829

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10829401. Public record. Not legal advice.