# Pond View, Inc. v. Maine Bd. of Envtl. Protection

> Superior Court of Maine · January 28, 2009

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10809465

## Case

- **Court:** Superior Court of Maine
- **Decided:** January 28, 2009
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Joseph M. Jabar
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10809465

## Opinion text

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT
CIVIL ACTION
KENNEBEC, ss. DOCKET NO. AP-07-40
J N\ ,\ - \/r··.,
I I V
'r
~,JI
IJ --' 1// .-,, ' ' ("'-,
, )1
;'

POND VIEW, INC.,

Petitioner

v. DECISION AND ORDER

MAINE BOARD OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION,

Respondent

Before the court is petitioner's M.R. Civ. P. 80C petition for judicial review of the

Board of Environmental Protection (BEP)'s decision affirming the decision of the

Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The DEP decision denied petitioner's

request to extend the time of temporarily out-of-service status for an underground oil

storage facility and required petitioner to abandon the facility by removing the

underground tanks and piping. (R. Ex. 53.) For the following reasons, the decision of

the BEP is affirmed.

FACTS

Petitioner has owned an underground storage tank facility since 1998, consisting

of two gasoline tanks and one diesel tank, which was utilized as a gas station adjunct to

a market. (R. Ex. 1.) On 9/30/04, by "Notification of Temporarily Out-of-Service

Tank," petitioner notified the DEP that the facility would be temporarily out-of-service

for a period not to exceed twelve months and that all product had been removed from

the tank with no more than one inch of residual left. (R. Ex. 33.) On 11 / 8/ 04, the DEP

received an annual inspection report dated 10/25/04 that indicated that tanks I, 2, and

3 were not in use and contained 5 inches, 6 inches, and 9 inches of product, respectively.
2

(R. Ex. 21.) On 12/20/04, the DEP received an update of the initial failing 10/25/04

inspection report. That report, dated 12/16/04, indicated that product had been

pumped out by Clean Harbors. (R. Ex. 22.) However, a subsequent inspection dated

10/5/05 showed that while tanks 1 and 2 contained less than one inch of product, tank

3 still contained 9.5 inches of diesel. (R. Ex. 23.) The 10/5/05 inspection report also

indicated that the fill pipes were not locked, product piping was not capped, and

dispensers were not secured. 1 (R. Ex. 23.)

The DEP issued a "Notice of Violation" (NOV) to petitioner on 7/31/06 for

failing to abandon an underground oil storage facility that had been out-of-service in

excess of twelve months. (R. Ex. 28.) Citing 38 M.R.S. § 566-A(1)2 and 06-096 CMR Ch.

691 § 11(C)3, the NOV required petitioner to abandon the underground tanks by

removing them. 4 (R. Ex. 28.) On 8/9/06, after receiving the NOV, petitioner asked for

an extension of time for out-of-service status. (R. Ex. 29.) The DEP denied petitioner's

initial request by letter dated 10/17/06, and denied petitioner's request for

reconsideration on 12/19/09. (R. Exs. 32, 37.) Petitioner appealed to the BEP, which

affirmed the DEP's decision, by order dated 5/24/07. (R. Ex. 53.)

STANDARD OF REVIEW

When the decision of an administrative agency is appealed pursuant to M.R. Civ.

P. 80C, this court reviews the agency's decision directly for abuse of discretion, errors of

law, or findings not supported by the evidence. Centamore v. Dep't of Human Servs.,

1 The Clean Harbors invoice, which the BEP accepted from petitioner as a supplemental exhibit, shows
the job description as "pump 2 gas tanks." (R. Ex. 41 (Attach. Supplement 3).)
2 Section 566-A(1) states, in relevant part, "[a]ll underground oil storage facilities and tanks that have
been, or are intended to be, taken out of service for a period of more than 12 months shall be properly
abandoned by the owner or operator of the facility .... All abandoned facilities and tanks shall be
removed, except where removal is not physically possible or practicable ...."
3 Section ll(C)(l) states, "[t]anks, piping or facilities that have been out-of-service for 12 months must be
removed within 60 days unless a written request has been made and has not been acted upon or unless
written permission has been granted by the commissioner under section 11(B)."
4 The NOV did not mention the 9.5 inches of product in the diesel tank.
3

664 A.2d 369, 370 (Me. 1995). "An administrative decision will be sustained if, on the

basis of the entire record before it, the agency could have fairly and reasonably found

the facts as it did." Seider v. Bd. of Exam'rs of Psychologists, 2000 ME 206, .:..>vuiu:e:.JIw"----- _
80C
J.JASAJl

'Pnnr'l ,,-I "".7 Tn .... vs. MaiT.. ", Ro.qril of Fnvirnnmental Protection
Plaintiff's Attorney Defendant's Attorney

Diane A. Khiel, Esq. Mary M. Sauer, AAG
P.O. Box 70 6 State House Station
Orono, Maine 04473 Augusta, Maine 04333-0006

Date of
Entry

6/15/07 Petition for Review, filed. s/Khiel, Esq.
7/16/07 Certification of Record, filed. s/Sauer, AAG (in vault drawer)
Index to Agency Record, filed.
7/18/07 Notice and Briefing Schedule mailed to attys. of record.

7/30/07 Motion for Stay of Briefing Schedule, filed. s/Khiel, Esq.
Proposed Order, filed.
8/6/07 ORDER, Studstrup, J.
Motion for Stay of Briefing Schedule: Granted.
8/9/07 Amended Index to the Agency Record, filed. s/Sauer, AAG

9/10/07 Motion to Modify Contents of the Record, filed. s/Khiel, Esq.
Proposed Order, filed. (Attachment A and Attachments B-L) (Attachment D,E)
10/3/07 10/1/07: Respondents Opposition to Motion to Modify Content of Record and
Incorportated Memorandum of Law filed by Mary Sauer AAG
10/9/07 Reply to Opposition to Motion to Modify Contents of the Record, filed.
s/Khiel, Esq.
Certificate of Service, filed. s/Khiel, Esq.

3/6/08 Motion for Continuance of Oral Argument, or in the Alternative, to Decide
Motion on Written Submissions, filed. s/Sauer, Esq.

3/28/08 MOTION, Jabar, J.
Motion to continue is granted. The court will decid~ the pending motion
on the written submission.
Copies mailed to attys. of record.
Date of
Entry Docket No. AP-07-040

8/11/08 ORDER ON MOTION. Jabar. J.
Motion to add ATTACHMENT B. Granted.
Motion to add ATTACHMENT C. Granted.
Motion to add ATTACHMENT D. Granted.
Motion to add ATTACHMENT E. Granted.
Motion to add ATTACHMENT F. Granted.
Motion to add ATTACHMENT G. Granted.
Motion to add ATTACHMENT H. Granted.
Motion to add ATTACHMENT I. Granted.
Motion to add ATTACHMENT J. Granted.
Motion to add ATTACHMENT K. Granted.
Motion to add ATTACHMENT L. Granted.
Copies mailed to attys. of record.
8718/08 AMENDED NOTICE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ISSUED.
Copies mailed to attys. of record.
8/22/08 Motion to Enlarge Time for Filing Brief. filed. s/Khiel. Esq.
Proposed Order. filed.
08/26/08 ON 08/25/08: Order on Motion s/ Jabar. J.
Petitionser's motion to enlard the vriefing schedule. wherein
Petitioner's brief shall be due 40 days after August 21. 2008. is
hereby granted. copy Atty Khiel and AAG Sauer.
8/25/08 Second Amended Index to the Agency Record and documents numbered 57
through 76-L to be added to the tabbed administrative record. Filed
by Mary Sauer. AAG.
9/29/08 Pecitioner's Brief. Khiel. Esq.
10/29/08 Letter entering appearance. filed. s/Macirowski. AAG
Opposition to Petition for 80C Appeal. filed. s/Macirowski. AAG
Plaintiff's Reply. filed. s/Walsh. Esq.

11/14/08 Plaintiff's Reply Brief. filed. s/Khiel. Esq.

Notice of setting for J I ~I if
D

sent to attorneys of record~

1/8/09 Hearing held with the Hon. Justice Joseph Jabar. presiding.
Diane Khiel. Esq. for the Petitioner and Nancy Macirowski. AAG for the
Respondent.
Oral arguments made to the court. Court to take matter under advisement.

1/28/09 DECISION AND ORDER. Jabar. J.
The decision of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection is
AFFIRMED.
Copies mailed to attys. of record.
Copies to Repository.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10809465. Public record. Not legal advice.
