# Board of Education of the Township of Pennsauken, Camden County v. Dr. Lovell Pugh-Bassett

> New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · February 10, 2025

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10796674

## Case

- **Court:** New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
- **Decided:** February 10, 2025
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10796674

## Opinion text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the
internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-1652-22

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE
TOWNSHIP OF PENNSAUKEN,
CAMDEN COUNTY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

DR. LOVELL PUGH-BASSETT,
EXECUTIVE COUNTY
SUPERINTENDENT, CAMDEN
COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION,
CAMDEN COUNTY,

Respondent-Respondent,

and

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE
TOWNSHIP OF PENNSAUKEN,
CAMDEN COUNTY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

PEGGY NICOLOSI, INTERIM
EXECUTIVE COUNTY
SUPERINTENDENT, NEW JERSEY
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,

Respondent-Respondent.
________________________________

Submitted February 3, 2025 – Decided February 10, 2025

Before Judges Sabatino and Gummer.

On appeal from the New Jersey Commissioner of
Education, Docket Nos. 304-12/18 and 36-2/19.

Gorman, D'Anella, and Morlok, LLC, attorneys for
appellant (William C. Morlok and Sara E. Kulp, on the
briefs).

Matthew J. Platkin, Attorney General, attorney for
respondents (Donna Arons, Assistant Attorney
General, of counsel; Laurie Fichera, Deputy Attorney
General, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

We have been advised that this matter has been amicably resolved, and

the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the

appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dismissed.

A-1652-22
2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10796674. Public record. Not legal advice.
