# People v. Brown

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · December 11, 2024 · 2024 NY Slip Op 06208

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10758631

## Case

- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** December 11, 2024
- **Citations:** 2024 NY Slip Op 06208
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10758631

## Opinion text

People v Brown ( 2024 NY Slip Op 06208 )
People v Brown
2024 NY Slip Op 06208
Decided on December 11, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 11, 2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
JANICE A. TAYLOR
JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.
2023-05086
(Ind. No. 76411/22)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Donald Brown, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Elisabeth R. Calcaterra of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Robert Ho on the brief), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jane Tully, J.), rendered May 5, 2023, convicting him of assault in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California ( 386 US 738 ), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California ( 386 US 738 ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted ( see id. ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 ; People v Paige , 54 AD2d 631 ; cf. People v Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 ).
BARROS, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, TAYLOR and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10758631. Public record. Not legal advice.