# Horn v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company LLC

> District Court, E.D. California · December 6, 2024

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10756634

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. California
- **Decided:** December 6, 2024
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10756634

## Opinion text

1 SABA BIREDA (pro hac vice) MICHELE HAYDEL GEHRKE (#215647)
JAMES HANNAWAY (pro hac vice) Reed Smith LLP
2 Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight, LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800
700 Pennsylvania Avenue S.E., Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94105
3 Washington, DC 20003 Telephone: (415) 543-8700
Telephone: (202) 499-5209 Fax: (415) 391-8269
4 Fax: (202) 499-5199 Email: mgehrke@reedsmith.com
Email: sbireda@sanfordheisler.com
5 JILL S. VOROBIEV (pro hac vice)
CARA VAN DORN (#321669) DAVID T. HARTMANN (pro hac vice)
6 Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight, LLP Reed Smith LLP
7911 Herschel Avenue, Suite 300 10 South Wacker Drive
7 La Jolla, CA 92037 Chicago, IL 60606
Telephone: (619) 577-4253 Telephone: (312) 207-1000
8 Fax: (619) 577-4250 Fax: (312) 207-6400
Email: cvandorn@sanfordheisler.com Email: jvorobiev@reedsmith.com
9
Attorneys for Plaintiffs AMANDA BROWN (#292559)
10 Reed Smith LLP
2850 N. Harwood Street, Suite 1500
11 Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: (469) 680-4232
12 Email: aebrown@reedsmith.com

13 Attorneys for Defendant
14
15
16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19 ALEX HORN, LANCE AYTMAN, AND Case No. 1:21-CV-01258-JLT-BAM
KEITH HOOKER,
20 [PROPOSED] ORDER CLOSING CASE
Plaintiffs,
21
District Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston
v.
22 Magistrate Judge: Barbara A. McAuliffe
KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY
23 LLC, Complaint Filed: August 19, 2021

24 Defendant.

25

26
27
28
1 On December 5, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation for voluntary dismissal with
2 | prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi). (Dkt. 156). Pursuant to Rule 41(a), a
3 | plaintiff may dismiss an action without court order in one of two ways: (1) by filing a notice of
4 | dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment,
5 | or (2) by stipulation of all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)G) & (ii).
6 | Voluntary dismissal under this rule requires no action on the part of the court. See United States v.
7 | 475 Martin Lane, 545 F.3d 1134, 1145 (9th Cir. 2008) (voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule
8 | 41(a)(1) is self-executing and requires no further action by court).
9 Here, the parties’ joint stipulation of dismissal is consistent with Federal Rule of Civil
10 | Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i1). Thus, the parties’ stipulated dismissal of this action with prejudice,
11 | with each party bearing that party’s own attorneys’ fees and costs, is effective upon its filing and
12 | without a court order.
13 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE THE CASE.
14
15 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 Dated: _ December 6, 2024 Charis [Tourn
TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ADRAED TA CTI ACE CAGE

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10756634. Public record. Not legal advice.