# Thurmond Guess, Sr. v. Leonardo Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 21, 2024

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10749768

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 21, 2024
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10749768

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1744 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/21/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1744

THURMOND R. GUESS, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LEONARDO BROWN, as Richland County Administrator; DARRELL JACKSON,
SR.; ROSE ANN ENGLISH; ALFRED T. GUESS; MARJORIE GUESS;
MARSHALL GREEN; RICHLAND COUNTY COUNSEL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:24-cv-01797-CMC)

Submitted: November 19, 2024 Decided: November 21, 2024

Before QUATTLEBAUM, RUSHING, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thurmond R. Guess, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1744 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/21/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Thurmond R. Guess, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing Guess’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint

with prejudice, and denying Guess’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s orders. Guess v. Brown, 3:24-cv-01797-CMC (D.S.C. June 4, 2024; July 10, 2024).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10749768. Public record. Not legal advice.