# David Jerome Brown v. State of Florida

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · November 6, 2024

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10732531

## Case

- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** November 6, 2024
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10732531

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- concluding that stipulation to payment of specific amount of costs pursuant to section 938.27, Florida Statutes, waives entitlement to any further hearing on such costs

## Opinion text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID JEROME BROWN,
Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2886

[November 6, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.
Lucie County; Michael C. Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562022CF002909A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Devin Johnson, Assistant
Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. Solages-
Jones, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, defense counsel properly concedes no issue of
arguable merit exists. 1 We specifically note that any argument that the
trial court’s assessment of prosecution costs was improper also lacks
merit. See Icon v. State, 322 So. 3d 117, 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)
(explaining that assessment of prosecution costs pursuant to section
938.27, Florida Statutes, need not be supported by evidence if the
defendant affirmatively agrees to pay the requested amount); Watts v.
State, 973 So. 2d 1271, 1273 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (concluding that
stipulation to payment of specific amount of costs pursuant to section
938.27, Florida Statutes, waives entitlement to any further hearing on
such costs).

Affirmed.

CONNER, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

1 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10732531. Public record. Not legal advice.