# Brown v. Auerbach

> District Court, W.D. Washington · November 27, 2019

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10699965

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, W.D. Washington
- **Decided:** November 27, 2019
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10699965

## Opinion text

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.,1
8
NO. C19-1311RSL
Plaintiff,
9
v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL
10
WILLIAM P. BARR, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
13
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma
14
pauperis (Dkt. # 1), his proposed complaint (Dkt. # 1-1), and the Report and Recommendation
15
of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. # 4). Plaintiff has not
16
17 objected or otherwise responded to the Report and Recommendation.2
18 Having reviewed the record as a whole under the standards articulated in 28 U.S.C.
19
§ 1915(e)(2) and having construed the allegations of the complaint liberally (see Bernhardt v.
20
Los Angeles County, 339 F.3d 920, 925 (9th Cir. 2003)), the Court finds that plaintiff’s
21
complaint is deficient and cannot be cured by amendment. Plaintiff’s allegations show that
22
23
24 1 The record in this matter identifies the plaintiff as both “Sr.” and “Jr.” Although the signature
25 line on the application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis could be interpreted as “Jr.,” the
complaint and other documents in the record clearly identify Mr. Brown as “Sr.”
26
2 Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address on October 21, 2019. Dkt. # 13. The Report and
27 Recommendation was forwarded to the new address. See Dkt. # 14 and Dkt. # 15.
1 venue is improper in this district and do not state facts giving rise to a plausible inference of
2
liability for any of the named defendants. The Court therefore adopts Judge Theiler’s
3
recommendation: this matter is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.
4
5 Dated this 27th day of November, 2019.
6 A
7 Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10699965. Public record. Not legal advice.