# Khimich v. Employment Dept.

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · December 20, 2023 · 329 Or. App. 715

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10610596

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** December 20, 2023
- **Citations:** 329 Or. App. 715
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10610596

## Opinion text

No. 678 December 20, 2023 715

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE
STATE OF OREGON

NATALYA V. KHIMICH,
Petitioner,
v.
EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
and Oregon Health Sciences University,
Respondents.
Employment Appeals Board
2022EAB0402; A178961

Argued and submitted November 6, 2023.
Ray D. Hacke argued the cause for petitioner. Also on the
briefs was Pacific Justice Institute.
Emily N. Snook, Assistant Attorney General, argued
the cause for respondent Employment Department. Also on
the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and
Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.
Misha Isaak argued the cause for respondent Oregon
Health & Science University. Also on the brief were Whitney
Brown and Stoel Rives LLP.
Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and
Kamins, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Reversed and remanded. Lavelle-Hayden v. Employment
Dept., 326 Or App 490, 533 P3d 75 (2023).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10610596. Public record. Not legal advice.