# Jocelyn Aristilde, R.N. v. Department of Health, Board of Nursing

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · July 31, 2024

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10492279

## Case

- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** July 31, 2024
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10492279

## Opinion text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

JOCELYN ARISTILDE, R.N.,
Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING,
Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2124

[July 31, 2024]

Administrative appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Health,
Board of Nursing; L.T. Case No. 2023-08306.

Stephen B. Burch of Smith & Associates, Melbourne, for appellant.

Sarah Young Hodges, Chief Appellate Counsel, Florida Department of
Health Prosecution Services Unit, Tallahassee, for appellee.

DAMOORGIAN, J.

Jocelyn Aristilde (“Appellant”) appeals a final order from the
Department of Health, Board of Nursing (“Department of Health”), revoking
his license to practice as a registered nurse. For the reasons outlined
below, we reverse the final order and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

Appellant applied to the Florida Board of Nursing (the “Board”) for
licensure as a registered nurse, indicating that he attended and graduated
from Palm Beach School of Nursing. The Board permitted Appellant to sit
for the registered nurse examination and subsequently issued his license
to practice nursing in late 2020. Appellant’s license was thereafter
renewed in 2022. Subsequently, through an FBI investigation, it was
discovered that Appellant, and several other students, received a
fraudulent diploma and transcript from the Palm Beach School of Nursing.
In February 2023, the Department of Health mailed a letter to Appellant’s
address of record notifying him of the investigation and requesting that he
either (1) submit a written response; (2) call the Department of Health to
schedule an interview; or (3) sign an attached voluntary relinquishment
form. A few days later, Appellant had a telephonic interview with a
Department of Health investigator.
The Department of Health subsequently filed an administrative
complaint against Appellant for violating sections 464.018(1)(a) and
456.072(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2020). A copy of the complaint was
mailed to Appellant’s address of record. Appellant concedes he received
the complaint and “timely submitted his election of rights form.” In May
2023, the Department of Health moved for an informal hearing and to
assess costs. Copies of the motions were mailed to Appellant’s address of
record. Appellant concedes he received those motions as well. In July
2023, a notice of hearing was mailed to Appellant’s address of record,
wherein it stated an informal hearing would take place on August 3, 2023,
and included the time and location. Appellant failed to appear at the
informal hearing. Following the hearing, the Board entered a final order
revoking Appellant’s license to practice as a registered nurse. On August
29, 2023, Appellant filed a motion for reconsideration, arguing that he did
not receive notice of the informal hearing, and attached a supporting
affidavit. Three days later, Appellant filed a notice of appeal. The final
order was stayed pending the outcome of this appeal.

On appeal, Appellant argues he did not receive notice of the informal
hearing, and the final order was entered without him being afforded any
opportunity to be heard. The record reflects the notice of hearing was
mailed to Appellant’s address of record, which creates a presumption that
Appellant received the notice. See Reich v. Dep’t of Health, 868 So. 2d
1275, 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (citing W.T. Holding, Inc. v. State Agency
for Health Care Admin., 682 So. 2d 1224, 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)). This
presumption, however, is rebuttable. Id. “Appellant’s denial of receipt of
the [notice of informal hearing] does not automatically overcome this
presumption, but it does create a question of fact that must be resolved
through an evidentiary hearing.” Id. As the Board never provided
Appellant an opportunity to prove that he did not receive notice of the
informal hearing, we reverse the final order revoking Appellant’s nursing
license and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether
Appellant received notice of the informal hearing.

Reversed and remanded.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., and MAY, J., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10492279. Public record. Not legal advice.