# Sorey v. Wilson County Book Review Committee

> District Court, M.D. Tennessee · June 26, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10438752

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, M.D. Tennessee
- **Decided:** June 26, 2023
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10438752

## Opinion text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER SOREY, )
)
Plaintiff, ) NO. 3:23-cv-00181
)
v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON
)
WILSON COUNTY BOOK REVIEW )
COMMITTEE, et al., )
)
Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 1-2
at 4, “Motion”).1 Plaintiff filed a memorandum in support of the preliminary-injunction motion
(Doc. No. 1-2 at 6). Defendants filed a Response thereto (Doc. No. 18).
For the reasons discussed herein, the Court will deny without prejudice Plaintiff’s
preliminary-injunction motion.
BACKGROUND2
Defendant Wilson County Board of Education is the school board for Wilson County,
Tennessee. Defendant Wilson County Book Review Committee (“Book Review”) was created to
evaluate the library materials in Wilson County schools. Plaintiff Christopher Sorey is a Wilson
County resident.

1 Originally styled as an “Application for Temporary Injunction,” the Court construes the Motion as
requesting a preliminary injunction. (Doc. No. 7 at 3).

2 The following facts are undisputed, and the Court takes them as true for the purposes of the Motion.
Plaintiff filed the Motion, seeking an injunction i) “ordering the Book Review Committee
to publish adequate public notice of its meetings in advance of them,” and ii) “forbidding the Book
Review Committee from meeting without publishing adequate public notice.” (Doc. No. 1-2 at 4).
Thereafter, the Response was filed.
LEGAL STANDARD

“Those seeking a preliminary injunction must meet several requirements. They must show
a likelihood of success on the merits. They must show irreparable harm in the absence of the
injunction. They must show that the balance of equities favors them. And they must show that the
public interest favors an injunction.” Sisters for Life, Inc. v. Louisville-Jefferson Cnty., 56 F.4th
400, 403 (6th Cir. 2022) (citations omitted).
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff argues that he faces irreparable harm absent a preliminary injunction because he
will be “deprived of his right to participate in government.” (Doc. No. 1-2 at 14). Defendants
argues that Plaintiff does not satisfy the irreparable harm requirement because “the Wilson County

Book Review Committee does not have any meetings scheduled nor are any anticipated to be
scheduled in the near future.” (Doc. No. 18 at 10).
“If the plaintiff isn't facing imminent and irreparable injury, there's no need to grant relief
now as opposed to at the end of the lawsuit.” D.T. v. Sumner Cty. Schs. 942 F.3d 324, 327 (6th Cir.
2019). The irreparable harm facing Plaintiff absent an injunction “must be both certain and
immediate[.]” Id. (citations and quotations omitted).
The Court finds that Plaintiff has not demonstrated imminent, irreparable harm necessary
to succeed on his Motion. Though Plaintiff perhaps would be deprived of a right to participate in
Book Review meetings if the Book Review Committee held a meeting without notice, there is no
indication that the Book Review will imminently hold a meeting. Book Review meetings are held
only when an interested person requests review of school materials and the request is not resolved
at the building level.* Thus, meetings are not held with regularity and are not necessarily imminent.
Absent any Book Review meetings, there is no risk of depriving Plaintiff of his alleged “right to
participate in government.” Therefore, the “irreparable harm” requirement is not met, and so a
preliminary injunction is unwarranted.

CONCLUSION
For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiff's preliminary-injunction motion is DENIED
without prejudice. If Defendants schedule a Book Review meeting, Plaintiff may refile his motion
for preliminary injunction.

ELI RICHARDSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

} Board Policy 4.403 (“Any student, parent/guardian, staff member, or Wilson County resident may request
review and reconsideration of specific items in school collections of materials. An attempt must be made
at the building level to informally resolve the concern with the school principal. If not resolved, the
complainant can appeal to the Director of Schools in writing requesting review and reconsideration of the
instructional material. The Director of Schools will appoint an administrative committee made up of a
school librarian, a parent, a school administrator, and the Deputy Director of Academics.”).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10438752. Public record. Not legal advice.