# MACK v. CLARK

> District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · January 20, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10418427

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** January 20, 2023
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10418427

## Opinion text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ERIE DIVISION

SHERMAN MACK, )
)
:21-CV- -RAL
Plaintiff 1:21-CV-00004-RA

VS. RICHARD A. LANZILLO
) Chief United States Magistrate Judge
SUPERINTENDENT CLARK, )
PE ENDENT AT SCI ALBION;
SUPERINTEN AL ° ) ORDER TO FILE BRIEF TO ACCOMPANY
DEPUTY ADAMS, DEPUTY AT SCI ) MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
ALBION; DEPUTY ENNIS, DEPUTY AT )
SCI ALBION; JOHN DOE 1, PRC BOARD )
MEMBER AT SCI ALBION; JOHN DOE 2, ) IN RE: ECF NO. 79
PRC BOARD MEMBER AT SCI ALBION; )
JOHN DOE 3, PRC BOARD MEMBER AT )
SCI ALBION; JOHN DOE 4, PRC BOARD )
MEMBER AT SCI ALBION; SECRETARY )
JOHN WETZEL, LT. SISSEM, CAPTAIN )
FLOYD, SGT. KEMP, MAJOR GILL, )
)
Defendants )
)

ORDER
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against all identified
Defendants. ECF No. 79. The motion requests default judgment because Defendants have failed
to comply with this Court’s order setting the responsive pleading deadline for December 19,
2022. See id; ECF No. 73.! But Plaintiff has not filed a supportive brief pursuant to the Local
Rules of this Court and the undersigned’s practices and procedures.

As of today’s date, Defendants have yet to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs second amended complaint.

Local Rule of the Court 7(A) stipulates that motions pending in this Court must comply
with, inter alia, the assigned Judge’s practices and procedures. LCvR 7(A). The undersigned’s
practices and procedures require supportive briefs to be contemporaneously filed with motions
unless the motion relates to discovery matters. See General Practice and Procedures United
States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo United States District Court for the Western District
of Pennsylvania Erie Division, at II.A, available at
https://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/sites/pawd/files/Lanzillo_General_ Practice Procedures _22.pdf.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to file a brief in support of the motion for default
judgment on or before February 3, 2023. This brief should address the three factors that
“control whether a default judgment should be granted: (1) prejudice to the plaintiff if default is
denied, (2) whether the defendant appears to have a litigable defense, and (3) whether
defendant's delay is due to culpable conduct.” Masciantonio v. United States, 2022 WL
6702102, at *2 (3d Cir. Oct. 11, 2022) (per curium) (quoting Chamberlain vy. Giampapa, 210
F.3d 154, 164 Gd Cir. 2000) (citing United States v. $55,518.05 in U.S. Currency, 728 F.2d 192,
195 (3d Cir. 1984))). Failure to timely file this supportive brief will result in dismissal of the
motion for default judgment without prejudice.

DATED this 20th day of January, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10418427. Public record. Not legal advice.