# BROWN v. BICKELL

> District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · October 26, 2022

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10404220

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** October 26, 2022
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10404220

## Opinion text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KENNETH BROWN, :
Petitioner, :
:
v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-CV-3424
:
BICKELL, et al., :
Respondents. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2022, upon consideration of Petitioner Kenneth
Brown’s Motion for Relief from Order of June 15, 2015 (ECF No. 18), seeking relief under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(b), it is hereby ORDERED:
1. The Motion is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without
prejudice to Brown’s right to file an application with the United States Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit for leave to file a second or successive habeas petition. See 28 U.S.C. §
2244(b)(3)(A).
2. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) because
no reasonable jurists would disagree with this Court’s procedural rulings or its disposition of
Brown's claims. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez

___________________________
JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, C. J.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10404220. Public record. Not legal advice.