# Ernest Pickett v. Marvin Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 4, 2013

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1039830

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 4, 2013
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1039830

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6693

ERNEST EUGENS PICKETT,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MR. MARVIN BROWN; MR. SCOTTIE THOMPSON; HON. MS. E. JOINER;
MR. GARY C. LEMEL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (4:13-cv-00496-RMG)

Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 4, 2013

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Eugens Pickett, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Ernest Eugens Pickett appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on Pickett’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Pickett v. Brown, No. 4:13-cv-00496-RMG (D.S.C. Apr. 16,

2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1039830. Public record. Not legal advice.