# Putnam v. The United States Army Review Board Agency

> District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · January 3, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10389965

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
- **Decided:** January 3, 2023
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10389965

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
LT. COL. (RET.) JOE A. PUTNAM, )
Plaintiff,
Vv. Case No. CIV-22-305-G
UNITED STATES ARMY
REVIEW BOARD AGENCY, )
Defendant.
ORDER
Now before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 12), seeking dismissal of
the claims raised in Plaintiff's original Complaint (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff has now timely
filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 14). Plaintiff's Amended Complaint supersedes
the original Complaint and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp.,
929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc.
No. 12) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of January, 2023.

(Vauba B. Kodo
United States District Judge

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10389965. Public record. Not legal advice.