# Jerome Brown, Sr. v. Brown County Circuit Court

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 14, 2013

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1037627

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 14, 2013
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1037627

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6831

JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BROWN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; STEPHANIE BECKETT, Land Records
Sup.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-01277-ELH)

Submitted: July 19, 2013 Decided: August 14, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Brown

Cnty. Circuit Court, No. 1:13-cv-01277-ELH (D. Md. filed May 1,

2013; entered May 2, 2013). We grant Brown leave to proceed in

forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1037627. Public record. Not legal advice.