# Waldo Fenner v. City of Durham/Board of Adjustment

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 29, 2013

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1035529

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 29, 2013
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1035529

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1437

WALDO FENNER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CITY OF DURHAM/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00383-TDS-JLW)

Submitted: July 25, 2013 Decided: July 29, 2013

Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Waldo Fenner, Appellant Pro Se. Emmanuel Dubois McGirt, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Waldo Fenner appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on Fenner’s 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (2006)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Fenner v. City of Durham/Board of Adjustment,

No. 1:10-cv-00383-TDS-JLW (M.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2013). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1035529. Public record. Not legal advice.