# The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation

> District Court, S.D. New York · March 17, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10349544

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, S.D. New York
- **Decided:** March 17, 2023
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10349544

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- finding that sensitive personal information of employees and third parties, as well as customer information regarding trading strategies, objectives, and transactions, constitute the “type of information [that] overcomes the presumption of public disclosure”

## Opinion text

The motion to seal is granted temporarily. The Court will assess
whether to keep the materials at issue sealed or redacted when
March 16, 2023 deciding the underlying motion. The Clerk of Court is directed to
terminate ECF No. 392.
Via ECF
SO ORDERED.
Honorable Jesse Furman
United States District Judge
Southern District of New York
AO Centre Street, Room 2202
New York, New York 10007 Mafch 17, 2023
Re: City of Philadelphia, et al. v. Bank of Am. Corp., et al., 19-cv-1608 (JMF)
Dear Judge Furman:
Pursuant to Rule 7 of the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, and the
Stipulation and Order Regarding Redaction and Sealing Process for Class Certification Briefing
(Dkt. No. 358), Defendants, on behalf of all parties, hereby seek leave to file by ECF,
Defendants’ Joint Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class
Certification, Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony, and supporting document (the
“Opposition Papers”) (Dkt. Nos. 386-391) with certain confidential documents and information
sealed or redacted.! An index listing all material that the parties seek to file in redacted form or
under seal is attached as Exhibit 1. The parties have met and conferred regarding each’s
proposed redactions and documents to be filed under seal, and no party opposes the requests of
any other party.
The parties’ respective justifications for sealing or redacting those materials under
Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006), and its progeny, are
set forth below. While the parties acknowledge that the materials to be redacted or sealed are
judicial documents to which the presumption of public access attaches, they believe that in
balancing the competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court should
grant the parties’ motion.
Defendants’ information. Defendants have substantially narrowed the scope of their
confidentiality designations with respect to Defendants’ discovery material previously
designated as Confidential or Highly Confidential and filed, quoted from, or referenced in the
Opposition Papers. The materials that Defendants wish to keep confidential and have filed in
redacted form or under seal are documents and testimony that discuss specific and sensitive
' Defendants’ Joint Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification,
along with the supporting Declaration of Brandon Gould (“Gould Declaration”) and exhibits, were filed
on February 9, 2023, with restricted access. Dkt. Nos. 390-391. Included as exhibits to the Gould
Declaration were the Expert Report of John Chalmers (“Chalmers Report”) (Dkt. No. 391-1) and the
Expert Report of Glenn Hubbard (“Hubbard Report”) (Dkt. No. 391-2). Defendants’ Motion to Exclude
Expert Testimony, including the Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Exclude
Expert Testimony, and the supporting Declaration of S. Conrad Scott (“Scott Declaration”) were also
filed on February 9, 2023, with restricted access.

information related to Defendants’ rate-setting processes, handling of VRDO inventory and
inventory limits, and handling of bonds unable to be remarketed, among other items.
Filing these materials in redacted or sealed form is consistent with the standards for
sealing in the Second Circuit. Courts in the Second Circuit and the Southern District of New
York have held that it is appropriate to seal commercially sensitive “business information that
might harm a litigant’s competitive standing.” New York v. Actavis, PLC, No. 14-CV-7473
(RWS), 2014 WL 5353774, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2014); see also City of Providence v. BATS
Glob. Markets, Inc., No. 14-CV-2811 (JMF), 2022 WL 539438, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 23, 2022)
(allowing for sealing of documents based on potential harm to competitive standing). In order to
avoid creating a competitive disadvantage for a litigant, courts regularly allow the sealing of
commercially sensitive information, including “trade secrets, confidential research and
development information, marketing plans, revenue information, pricing information, and the
like.” Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Keystone Foods Holdings, Ltd., No. 1:19-CV-010125 (ALC), 2020
WL 5819864, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2020).
The documents and testimony Defendants wish to keep confidential fall within the scope
of confidential and sensitive commercial information that should be sealed. These documents
include:
• Documents and testimony (and descriptions of the same) related to Defendants’ pricing
methodologies that provide specific information about analysis conducted and inputs
used to determine Defendants’ rates, and other specific processes related to rate-setting.
See Dkt. No. 389 at nn.7, 12, p. 23; Dkt. No. 388-1 at 136:2-12, 136:18-137:5, 207:6-7;
Dkt. No. 388-7 at 29:20-30:5, 30:13-20; Dkt. No. 388-8 at pp. 2-3; Dkt. No. 388-10 at
37:5-38:17; Dkt. No. 388-14 at 60:25-63:25, 78:16-80:14; Dkt. No. 388-15 at 49:15-
50:17; Dkt. No. 388-16 at 75:13-76:3; Dkt. No. 388-19 at 114:16-116:25; Dkt. No. 388-
20 at 138:19-139:25; Dkt. No. 388-22 at pp. 2-3; Dkt. No. 388-23 at p. 1; Dkt. No. 390 at
pp. 5-6 & n. 8; Dkt. No. 391-1 at p. 12 n.34, p. 16 & n.47, p. 28 n.99, p.48 n.177; Dkt.
No. 391-2 at p. 60 n.170, p. 81-82 nn. 236, 240, 244, pp. 90-103 & nn. 275-77, 280-85,
287-88, 290, 295-298, 300, 314, 318-21, 323, 325-26, 331-32, 334, 336-37, 339-40, p.
106 n.349. p. 107 n.360, p. 130, p. 159 n.455, p. 192 n.536, pp. 194-95 nn.544, 548, p.
.224 n.597; Dkt. No. 391-3 at 49:15-50:17, 54:5-55:9; Dkt. No. 391-6 at pp. 2-5; Dkt. No.
391-7 at 44:24-53:7; Dkt. No. 391-8 at pp. 2-3; Dkt. No. 391-9 at 99:19-101:16; Dkt. No.
391-12 at 84:12-85:17, 85:22-25, 86:11-25, 141:25-142:10; Dkt. No. 391-13 at 72:15-
78:14, 80:12-83:17, 114:2-117:24, 146:2-148:24; Dkt. No. 391-15; Dkt. No. 391-17 at
87:2-90:6, 178:7-179:6; Dkt. No. 391-18 at pp. 2-7; Dkt. No. 391-19 at 72:8-12, 86:12-
88:17, 94:23-24, Dkt. No. 391-20 at 165:2-168:12; Dkt. No. 391-21 at 45:6-46:12, 192:6-
193:16; Dkt. No. 391-22 at 63:2-64:16, 65:8-12, 72:15-24, 200:9-10, 200:23-24, 201:13-
202:14, Dkt. No. 391-23 at 248:23-251:25, 274:2-280:25; Dkt. No. 391-24 at 97:2-99:23,
114:13-116:25, Dkt. No. 391-25 at 135:19-22; Dkt. No. 391-26 at p. 1; Dkt. No. 391-27
at pp. 2-3; Dkt. No. 391-29; Dkt. No. 391-30 at 147:12-150:25; Dkt. No. 391-31 at 53:2-
22, 54:2-55:3, 55:5-18, 55:24-56:12, 56:16-20, 57:8-10, 57:17-25; Dkt. No. 391-32 at
35:12-36:22; Dkt. No. 391-35 at 95:3-18; Dkt. No. 391-36 at 57:2-10, 58:23-59:5, 59:23-
60:3; Dkt. No. 391-40 at 97:17-98:17, 99:8-100:23; Dkt. No. 391-41 at 56:10-59:8; Dkt.
No. 391-83 at 29:12-30:13; Dkt. No. 391-84 at p. 3; Dkt. No. 391-85 at pp. 1-2; Dkt. No.
391-87 at pp. 2-6. Disclosure of this information would allow competitors to essentially
re-create portions of Defendants’ proprietary pricing methodologies and rate-setting
processes. While some of these materials may be from before 2010, similar or identical
processes are still in place today
• Testimony related to Defendants’ handling of bonds they were unable to remarket. See
Dkt. No. 391-78 at 183:4-10. Disclosure of this information would allow competitors to
strategically market their handling of similar circumstances against Defendants’
practices.
• Documents and testimony (and descriptions of same) related to Defendants’ tracking of
VRDO inventory, inventory levels on specific CUSIPs, handling of inventory, and
inventory limits. See Dkt. No. 388-10 at 109:19-110:7; Dkt. No. 388-15 at 96:5-25; Dkt.
No. 391-1 at p. 50, pp. 133-35 & nn. 473, 477, 480, 484, p. 140, p. 142 & n.516, pp. 146-
47 & nn. 538-40, pp. 152, 158, 168, 171-72, Appendix D: Exhibits 39, 41, 42, 45, 53;
Dkt. No. 391-2 at p. 256 nn. 652, 654-55, p. 257 n.658, pp. 260-61 & nn.662, 665, pp.
263-64 & nn. 672, pp. 267-68 & nn. 679-80, 682-83, pp. 270-71 & nn.688, pp. 691-92;
Dkt. No. 391-42 at 28:9-29:4; Dkt. No. 391-78 at 183:4-10, 184:6-186:24. Disclosure of
this information would allow competitors to evaluate Defendants’ specific risk limits and
inventory systems, and to adjust their processes to compete against Defendants
accordingly.
• Documents and testimony (and descriptions of same) related to comparisons of
Defendants’ rates to competitors, client development strategies, and positioning in the
market. See Dkt. No. 388-20 at 137:4-138:13; Dkt. No. 391-2 at pp. 39-41 nn.116, 118,
p.46 n.133, pp. 47-48 nn.137, 138, p. 162 n.467; Dkt. No. 391-77 at 124:21-25.
Disclosure of these materials could allow competitors to strategically position themselves
against Defendants, to the competitive detriment of Defendants.
• Documents and testimony (and descriptions of same) related to remarketing fees charged
by Defendants. See Dkt. No. 391-2 at p. 47 n.138; Dkt. No. 391-19 at 115:2-14.
Disclosure of this information could allow competitors to strategically position
themselves against Defendants, to the competitive detriment of Defendants.
• Documents and testimony (and descriptions of the same) related to costs associated with
carrying VRDOs on Defendants’ books. See Dkt. No. 388-22 at p. 2; Dkt. No. 391-2 at
p.61 n.174; Dkt. No. 391-6 at p. 3; Dkt. No. 391-8 at p. 2; Dkt. No. 391-78 at 184:6-19,
185:3-186:24. Similar to the materials discussed above, disclosure of these materials
could allow competitors to position themselves favorably against Defendants in the
market.
• Documents and testimony (and descriptions of the same) related to internal strategy and
presentations, and compliance decisions and procedures of Defendants. See Dkt. No.
388-11 at 19:21-20:16; Dkt. No. 388-18 at 28:9-29:5; Dkt. No. 391-2 at p. 155 nn. 444-
45, p. 239 n.623, p. 246 n.639; Dkt. No. 391-24 at 199:7-25, 232:3-235:25. Disclosure of
this sensitive strategy and compliance material would allow great access into Defendants’
internal decision-making processes, that could be used to Defendant’s disadvantage.
• Descriptions and quotes from documents and testimony related to advice provided to
clients of Defendants, and Defendants’ clients’ discussions of proprietary financing
strategies. See Dkt. No. 391-1 at p. 63 & n.232; Dkt. No. 391-2 at p. 167 n. 482, p. 173
n.499. Similar to the materials discussed above, disclosure of these materials could
allow competitors to position themselves favorably against Defendants in the market.
• Documents and testimony (and descriptions of same) related to government
investigations into VRDOs. See Dkt. No. 391-2 at p. 143 & n.407; Dkt. No. 391-86; Dkt.
No. 391-84 at p. 3; Dkt. No. 391-86 at p. 2. Government regulators have kept these
investigations confidential and they have not been publicly disclosed.
Plaintiffs’ information. In response to Defendants’ extensive citation to, and discussion of,
internal financial matters of the Named Plaintiffs found in confidential discovery material, and
consistent with the legal authorities cited above, Plaintiffs request the sealing of only certain
confidential information in three specific categories:
• Documents and testimony related to the Named Plaintiffs’ financial strategies for and
performance of VRDO issuances. See Dkt. No. 390 at pp. 15-16 & n.20, p. 45 n.54, p. 48
n.62; Dkt. No. 391-1 at p. 8, p. 9 n.23, p. 18 n.55, p. 19 n.62, pp. 20-21 & nn.63-65, 69-
70, pp. 23-24 & nn.77-78, 83, p. 32, p. 49 n.177, p. 50 n.179, p. 52 & n.186, p. 54 n.195,
p.62 & n.229, p. 72 n.253, p. 134-35, p. 146, p. 148 n.548, p. 168; Dkt. No. 391-2 at p.
36 n.108, pp. 39-40 n.116, pp. 41-42 & n.120-21, p. 44 n.128, pp. 46-47 & nn.136-37, p.
150 n.428, p. 173 n.497, p. 256 & n.655, p. 260 & n.663, p.261 & n.666, p.263 & n.672,
p.270 n.690; Dkt. No. 391-45; Dkt. No. 391-46; Dkt. No. 391-66; and Dkt. No. 391-69.
• Documents and testimony related to the Named Plaintiffs’ entry into interest rate swaps,
including the confidentially negotiated economic terms thereof. See Dkt. No. 390 at p.
35, p. 36 n.34, p. 37 & n.37, p. 40 & nn.45-46, p. 41 n.48, p. 42 n.49; Dkt. No. 391-1 at p.
72 n.253, pp. 73-74 & nn.254, 257-58, p. 74 & n.258, p. 75 & nn.262-63, pp. 76-81, p. 82
& n.291, p.84 & n.310, p. 85 & n.311, p. 88 & n.322, p. 90 & n.325, p. 91 & n.327, p. 93
& n.339, p. 94 nn.339, 342, p. 96 & n.352, p. 97 & nn.357-59, pp. 98-99 & nn.363-64,
368, p. 100 nn.368, 370-71, p. 101 Ex. 25, pp. 114-15, p. 137, p. 162-63, Appx. D–Ex.
22, Appx. D–Ex. 28 n.1, Appx. D–Ex. 34; Dkt. No. 391-44; Dkt. No. 391-50; Dkt. No.
391-61; Dkt. No. 391-63; Dkt. No. 391-66; Dkt. No. 391-68; and Dkt. No. 391-79.
• Sensitive material in the expert report of Plaintiffs’ expert Professor William Schwert,
which quantifies the impact of Defendants’ alleged artificial inflation of VRDO rates and
calculates his initial estimate of class damages therefrom (the same subject matter the
Court permitted to be sealed when granting temporarily the Parties’ December 1, 2022
joint letter motion to seal that was filed in connection with Plaintiffs’ motion for class
certification (Dkt. No. 372)). See Dkt. No. 390 at p. 18, p. 24; Dkt. No. 391-1 at p. 12,
Ex. 1, p. 14 Ex. 2 & n.42, p. 22 Ex. 3, p. 36 & n.132, p. 50, p. 63 Ex. 13, p. 66 & Ex. 15,
p.68 n.244, p. 69, p. 70, pp. 76-84 & Ex. 20-22, p. 86, p. 101 Ex. 25, p. 117 Ex. 36, p.
128, p. 129, p. 130 & n.466, p. 136, p. 138, p. 144 & n.526, p. 148, p. 149, p. 153, p. 154,
p.156, p. 161, p. 166, p. 167, p. 169, p. 179, Appx. D–Exs. 1-3, Appx. D–Ex. 13, Appx.
D–Ex. 15, Appx. D–Exs. 20-22, Appx. D–Ex. 36; Dkt. No. 391-2 at p. 7, p. 50, p. 176,
p.177, p. 197, p. 203, p. 208, p. 211, p. 213, p. 220, p. 247, p. 248, p. 257 & n.659.
Third party information. Defendants, on behalf of third parties, also request permission
to seal or redact, as applicable, certain confidential business and personal information of third
parties that is quoted and discussed in the Opposition Papers. The relevant third parties provided
such information during discovery pursuant to document and deposition subpoenas, and subject
to the Stipulated Protective Order. Defendants have contacted all relevant third parties to request
permission to disclose this information publicly, but in some cases have not received permission
from third parties to do so.
Because it could be commercially harmful to the third parties to publicly disclose such
information, courts in this District have held that third-party confidential information warrants
sealing over public access. See, e.g., Dodona I, LLC v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 119 F. Supp. 3d
152, 156-57 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (finding that sensitive personal information of employees and third
parties, as well as customer information regarding trading strategies, objectives, and transactions,
constitute the “type of information [that] overcomes the presumption of public disclosure”); see
also United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1995) (“We have previously held that
‘[t]he privacy interests of innocent third parties . . . should weigh heavily in a court’s balancing
equation.’”) (citations omitted). Accordingly, sensitive third-party information has been
authorized to be redacted from a motion for class certification. Valelly v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Inc., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140126, at *2-4 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2022). To the
extent that Defendants receive permission from additional third parties to file these materials
publicly, Defendants will notify the Court and modify this request accordingly.
* * *
Accordingly, on behalf of the parties, Defendants respectfully request that the portions of
Defendants’ memoranda of law in opposition to class certification and to exclude expert
testimony, Defendants’ expert reports, Exhibits 1, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14-16, 18, 19, 20, 22, and 23 to
the Scott Declaration, and Exhibits 3, 6-9, 12, 13, 17-27, 29-33, 35, 36, 40-42, 79, 80, and 85-89
to the Gould Declaration, highlighted in green (as indexed in Exhibit 1 hereto) be permitted to be
filed in redacted form. All such materials are being filed with this letter-motion in both redacted
and highlighted form, in accordance with Rule 7.C.iii of the Court’s Individual Rules and
Practices in Civil Cases.2
On behalf of the parties, Defendants respectfully further request that Exhibit 12 to the
Scott Declaration and Exhibits 15, 44-46, 50, 57, 62, 64, 67-70, 72, 81, and 90 to the Gould
Declaration (as also indexed in Exhibit 1), which were filed under seal on February 9, 2023, be
permitted to remain under seal.
Respectfully submitted,
2 Defendants’ filings made on February 9, 2023 highlighted in yellow the relevant portions of certain
deposition transcripts cited in the Opposition Papers.
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP JONES DAY
By: s/ Robert D. Wick By: Michael P. Conway*
Andrew A. Ruffino Jayant W. Tambe
The New York Times Building Laura Washington Sawyer
620 Eighth Avenue Céalagh P. Fitzpatrick
New York, New York 10018 Meredith Christian
Telephone: (212) 841-1000 250 Vesey Street
aruffino@cov.com New York, NY 10281-1047
Telephone: (212) 326-3604
Robert D. Wick Fax: (212) 755-7306
Brandon Gould jtambe@jonesday.com
850 Tenth Street, N.W. lwsawyer@jonesday.com
Washington, D.C. 20001 cfitzpatrick@jonesday.com
Telephone: (202) 662-6000
rwick@cov.com Michael P. Conway
110 N. Upper Wacker Dr.
Attorneys for Defendants JPMorgan Chase Chicago, IL 60606
Bank, N.A., and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Telephone: (312) 269-4145
Fax: (312) 782-8585
mconway@jonesday.com
Attorneys for Defendants Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo
Funds Management, LLC, and Wells Fargo
Securities LLC
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE,
AND DORR LLP MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
By: Noah Levine* By: Boris Bershteyn*
Noah Levine Boris Bershteyn
Chris Johnstone Lara Flath
7 World Trade Center Kamali P. Willett
250 Greenwich Street One Manhattan West
New York, NY 10007 New York, NY 10001
Telephone: (212) 230-8800 Telephone: (212) 735-3000
noah.levine@wilmerhale.com Fax: (917) 777-3834
chris.johnstone@wilmerhale.com boris.bershteyn@skadden.com
lara.flath@skadden.com
Heather Nyong’o kamali.willett@skadden.com
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
650 California Street, Suite 2000 Gretchen Wolf
San Francisco, CA 94108 155 North Wacker Drive
Telephone: (650) 815-4140 Chicago, Illinois 60606
hnyongo@cgsh.com Telephone: (312) 407-0700
Fax: (312) 407-0411
Attorneys for Defendants Bank of America gretchen.wolf@skadden.com
Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., and
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Attorneys for Defendants Barclays Bank PLC
Incorporated (including as successor in and Barclays Capital Inc.
interest to Banc of America Securities LLC)
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON &
GARRISON LLP GARRISON LLP
By: Susanna M. Buergel* By: Robert Y. Sperling*
Brad S. Karp Robert Y. Sperling
Susanna M. Buergel Staci Yablon
1285 Avenue of the Americas William B. Michael
New York, NY 10019-6064 1285 Avenue of the Americas
Telephone: (212) 373-3553 New York, NY 10019-6064
Fax: (212) 492-0553 Telephone: (212) 373-3396
bkarp@paulweiss.com Fax: (212) 492-4018
sbuergel@paulweiss.com syablon@paulweiss.com
rsperling@paulweiss.com
Kenneth A. Gallo wmichael@paulweiss.com
Jane B. O’Brien
Lina Dagnew Paul D. Brachman
2001 K Street, NW 2001 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006-1047 Washington, DC 20006-1047
Telephone: (202) 223-7356 Telephone: (202) 223-7440
Fax: (202) 204-7356 Fax: (202) 379-4098
kgallo@paulweiss.com pbrachman@paulweiss.com
jobrien@paulweiss.com
ldagnew@paulweiss.com Attorneys for Defendant Goldman Sachs &
Co. LLC
Attorneys for Defendants Citigroup Inc.,
Citibank, N.A., Citigroup Global Markets
Inc., and Citigroup Global Markets Limited
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
By: Sergei Zaslavsky* By: Adam S. Hakki*
Andrew J. Frackman Adam S. Hakki
Michael M. Klotz Grace J. Lee
7 Times Square 599 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10036 New York, NY 10022-6069
Telephone: (212) 326-2000 Telephone: (212) 848-4000
Facsimile: (212) 326-2061 Facsimile: (212) 848-7179
afrackman@omm.com adam.hakki@shearman.com
mklotz@omm.com grace.lee@shearman.com
Sergei Zaslavsky John F. Cove, Jr.
Adam Walker 535 Mission Street, 25th Floor
1625 Eye St, NW San Francisco, CA 94105-2997
Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (415) 616-1100
Telephone: (202) 383-5300 Facsimile: (415) 616-1199
Facsimile: (202) 383-5414 john.cove@shearman.com
szaslavsky@omm.com
awalker@omm.com Attorneys for Defendants Morgan Stanley,
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, Morgan
Attorneys for Defendants The Royal Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley Capital
Bank of Canada and RBC Capital Markets, Group Inc.
LLC
* Signatures used with permission pursuant to S.D.N.Y. ECF Rule 8.5(b).
cc: All counsel of record (via ECF)
Exhibit 1
Document Request for Location of Requested Redactions or
Redactions or to Redactions Sealing
Seal in Full? Requested By
Memorandum of Law Redactions Footnote 7 Defendants
in Support of Footnote 9 Defendants o/b/o
Defendants’ Motion third parties
to Exclude Expert Footnote 10 Defendants
Testimony (Dkt. No. Page 23 Defendants
389)
Scott Decl., Exhibit 1 Redactions Pages 136-37, 207 Defendants
(Dkt. No. 388-1)
Scott Decl., Exhibit 7 Redactions Pages 29-30 Defendants
(Dkt. No. 388-7)
Scott Decl., Exhibit 8 Redactions Pages 2-3 Defendants
(Dkt. No. 388-8)
Scott Decl., Exhibit Redactions Pages 37-38, 109-110 Defendants
10 (Dkt. No. 388-10)
Scott Decl., Exhibit Redactions Pages 19-20 Defendants
11 (Dkt. No. 388-11)
Scott Decl., Exhibit Seal Defendants o/b/o
12 (Dkt. No. 388-12) third parties
Scott Decl., Exhibit Redactions Pages 60-63, 78-80 Defendants
14 (Dkt. No. 388-14)
Scott Decl., Exhibit Redactions Pages 49-50, 96 Defendants
15 (Dkt. No. 388-15)
Scott Decl., Exhibit Redactions Pages 75-76 Defendants
16 (Dkt. No. 388-16)
Scott Decl., Exhibit Redactions Pages 28-29 Defendants
18 (Dkt. No. 388-18)
Scott Decl., Exhibit Redactions Pages 114-16 Defendants
19 (Dkt. No. 388-19)
Scott Decl., Exhibit Redactions Pages 137-39 Defendants
20 (Dkt. No. 388-20)
Scott Decl., Exhibit Redactions Pages 2-3 Defendants
22 (Dkt. No. 388-22)
Scott Decl., Exhibit Redactions Pages 1-2 Defendants
23 (Dkt. No. 388-23)
Defendants’ Joint Redactions Pages 5-6 & footnote 8 Defendants
Memorandum of Law Pages 15-16 & footnote 20 Plaintiffs
in Opposition to Page 18 Plaintiffs
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Page 24 Plaintiffs
Class Certification Page 35 Plaintiffs
(Dkt. No. 390) Footnote 34 Plaintiffs
Page 37 & footnote 37 Plaintiffs
Page 40 & footnote 45-46 Plaintiffs
Footnote 46 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Footnote 48 Plaintiffs
Footnote 49 Plaintiffs
Footnote 54 Plaintiffs
Footnote 62 Plaintiffs
Footnote 53 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Footnote 62 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Declaration of Redactions Pages 5-7 Defendants o/b/o
Brandon Gould third parties
Expert Report of John Redactions Page 8 Plaintiffs
Chalmers (Dkt. No. Footnote 23 Plaintiffs
391-1) Page 12 Plaintiffs
Footnote 34 Defendants
Page 14 & footnote 42 Plaintiffs
Page 16 & footnote 47 Defendants
Footnote 55 Plaintiffs
Page 19 & footnotes 59, 61 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Footnote 62 Plaintiffs
Pages 20-21 & footnotes Plaintiffs
63-65, 69-70
Page 22 Plaintiffs
Pages 23-24 & footnotes Plaintiffs
77-78, 83
Footnotes 79, 80 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Footnote 99 Defendants
Page 32 Plaintiffs
Page 36 and footnote 132 Plaintiffs
Footnote 151 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Footnote 177 Defendants
(redactions on
page 48)
Defendants o/b/o
third parties
(redactions on
page 49)
Plaintiffs
Footnote 179 Defendants o/b/o
third parties and
Plaintiffs
Page 50 Defendants and
Plaintiffs
Page 52 & footnote 186 Plaintiffs
Footnote 195 Plaintiffs
Page 62 & footnotes 229, Defendants o/b/o
230 third parties and
Plaintiffs
Page 63 & footnote 232 Defendants and
Plaintiffs
Page 66 Plaintiffs
Footnote 244 Plaintiffs
Pages 69-70 Plaintiffs
Footnote 253 Plaintiffs
Pages 73-74 & footnotes Plaintiffs
254, 257-58
Page 75 & footnotes 262- Plaintiffs
63
Footnotes 259, 270, 271 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Pages 76-84 Plaintiffs
Pages 78-79 & footnotes Defendants o/b/o
277, 284 third parties
Footnote 289 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Pages 81-82 & footnotes Defendants o/b/o
291-93 third parties
Page 82 & footnote 291 Plaintiffs
Pages 84-86 & footnotes Plaintiffs
310-11
Page 87 & footnote 318 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Page 88 & footnote 322 Plaintiffs
Page 90 & footnote 325 Plaintiffs
Page 91 & footnote 327 Plaintiffs
Pages 91-92 & footnotes Defendants o/b/o
328, 332-33 third parties
Page 93 & footnote 339 Plaintiffs
Footnote 339, 342 Plaintiffs
Pages 96-99 & footnotes Defendants o/b/o
349, 351, 354, 356, 362, third parties
364-65
Page 96 & footnote 352 Plaintiffs
Page 97 & footnotes 357- Plaintiffs
59
Pages 98-99 & footnotes Plaintiffs
363-64, 368
Footnotes 368, 370-71 Plaintiffs
Footnotes 369, 371 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Page 101 Plaintiffs
Pages 102-03 & footnotes Defendants o/b/o
378-79 third parties
Footnote 397 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Page 114-15 Plaintiffs
Page 117 Plaintiffs
Footnotes 415-16 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Page 118 & footnote 420 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Footnote 431 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Page 127 & footnote 456 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Pages 128-30 & footnote Plaintiffs
466
Page 131 & footnote 467 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Pages 133-35 & footnotes Defendants and
473, 477, 481, 484 Plaintiffs
Page 136-38 Plaintiffs
Footnote 495 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Page 140 Defendants
Page 142 & footnote 516 Defendants
Page 143 & footnote 519 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Footnote 526 Plaintiffs
Pages 146-47 & footnotes Defendants and
538-40 Plaintiffs
Pages 148-49 & footnote Defendants o/b/o
548 third parties and
Plaintiffs
Page 152 Defendants
Page 153-54 Plaintiffs
Page 156 Plaintiffs
Page 158 Defendants
Page 161-63 Plaintiffs
Footnote 587 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Pages 166-67 Plaintiffs
Page 168 Defendants
Page 169 Plaintiffs
Pages 171-72 Defendants
Pages 175-77 & footnotes Defendants o/b/o
638, 644, 648 third parties
Page 179 Plaintiffs
Appendix D, Exhibits 1-3, Plaintiffs
13, 15, 20-22, 28 n.1, 34,
36
Appendix D, Exhibits 39, Defendants
41, 42, 45, 53
Expert Report of Redactions Page 7 Plaintiffs
Glenn Hubbard (Dkt. Footnote 108 Plaintiffs
No. 391-2) Footnote 116 Defendants and
Plaintiffs
Footnote 117 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Footnote 118 Defendants
Pages 41-42 & footnotes Plaintiffs
120-21
Footnote 128 Plaintiffs
Footnote 133 Defendants
Pages 46-47 & footnotes Plaintiffs
136-37
Footnotes 137-38 Defendants
Page 50 Plaintiffs
Footnote 174 Defendants
Footnote 177 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Footnote 234 Defendants
Page 81 & footnotes 236, Defendants
240
Footnote 244 Defendants
Pages 90-103 and footnotes Defendants
275-77, 280-85, 287-88,
290, 295-298, 300, 314,
318-21, 323, 325-26, 331-
32, 334, 336-37, 339-40
Footnote 349 Defendants
Footnote 360 Defendants
Page 130 Defendants
Page 143 & footnote 407 Defendants
Footnote 428 Plaintiffs
Footnote 444 Defendants
Footnote 455 Defendants
Footnote 467 Defendants
Footnote 482 Defendants o/b/o
third parties
Footnote 497 Plaintiffs
Footnote 499 Defendants
Page 176 Plaintiffs
Page 177 Plaintiffs
Footnote 536 Defendants
Footnote 544 Defendants
Page 197 Plaintiffs
Page 203 Plaintiffs
Page 208 Plaintiffs
Page 211 Plaintiffs
Page 213 Plaintiffs
Page 220 Plaintiffs
Footnote 623 Defendants
Footnote 639 Defendants
Page 247 Plaintiffs
Page 248 Plaintiffs
Page 256 & footnotes 652, Defendants
654-55
Page 256 & footnote 655 Plaintiffs
Footnote 658 Defendants
Page 257 & footnote 659 Plaintiffs
Pages 260-61 & footnote Defendants
662, 665
Page 260 & footnote 663 Plaintiffs
Page 261 & footnote 666 Plaintiffs
Pages 263-64 & footnote Defendants and
672 Plaintiffs
Pages 267-68 & footnotes Defendants
679-80, 682-83
Pages 270-71 and footnote Defendants and
688, 690-92 Plaintiffs
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 49-50, 54-55 Defendants
Exhibit 3 (Dkt. No.
391-3)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 2-4 Defendants
Exhibit 6 (Dkt. No.
391-6)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 44-53 Defendants
Exhibit 7 (Dkt. No.
391-7)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 2-3 Defendants
Exhibit 8 (Dkt. No.
391-8)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 99-101 Defendants
Exhibit 9 (Dkt. No.
391-9)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 84-86, 141-42 Defendants
Exhibit 12 (Dkt. No.
391-12)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 72-78, 80-83, 114- Defendants
Exhibit 13 (Dkt. No. 17, 146-48
391-13)
Gould Declaration Seal Defendants
Exhibit 15 (Dkt. No.
391-15)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 87-90, 178-79 Defendants
Exhibit 17 (Dkt. No.
391-17)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 2-7 Defendants
Exhibit 18 (Dkt. No.
391-18)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 72, 86-88, 94, 115 Defendants
Exhibit 19 (Dkt. No.
391-19)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 165-68 Defendants
Exhibit 20 (Dkt. No.
391-20)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 45-46, 192-93 Defendants
Exhibit 21 (Dkt. No.
391-21)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 63-65, 72, 200-02 Defendants
Exhibit 22 (Dkt. No.
391-22)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 248-51, 274-80 Defendants
Exhibit 23 (Dkt. No.
391-23)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 97-99, 114-16, 199, Defendants
Exhibit 24 (Dkt. No. 232-235
391-24)
Gould Declaration Redactions Page 135 Defendants
Exhibit 25 (Dkt. No.
391-25)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 1-2 Defendants
Exhibit 26 (Dkt. No.
391-26)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 2-3 Defendants
Exhibit 27 (Dkt. No.
391-27)
Gould Declaration Redactions Defendants
Exhibit 29 (Dkt. No.
391-29)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 147-150 Defendants
Exhibit 30 (Dkt. No.
391-30)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 53-57 Defendants
Exhibit 31 (Dkt. No.
391-31)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 35-36 Defendants
Exhibit 32 (Dkt. No.
391-32)
Gould Declaration Redactions Errata Defendants
Exhibit 33 (Dkt. No.
391-33)
Gould Declaration Redactions Page 95 Defendants
Exhibit 35 (Dkt. No.
391-35)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 57-60 Defendants
Exhibit 36 (Dkt. No.
391-36)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 97-100 Defendants
Exhibit 40 (Dkt. No.
391-40)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 56-59 Defendants
Exhibit 41 (Dkt. No.
391-41)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 28-29 Defendants
Exhibit 42 (Dkt. No.
391-42)
Gould Declaration Seal Plaintiffs
Exhibit 44 (Dkt. No.
391-44)
Gould Declaration Seal Plaintiffs
Exhibit 45 (Dkt. No.
391-45)
Gould Declaration Seal Plaintiffs
Exhibit 46 (Dkt. No.
391-46)
Gould Declaration Seal Plaintiffs
Exhibit 50 (Dkt. No.
391-50)
Gould Declaration Seal Defendants o/b/o
Exhibit 57 (Dkt. No. third parties
391-56)
Gould Declaration Seal Plaintiffs
Exhibit 62 (Dkt. No.
391-61)
Gould Declaration Seal Defendants o/b/o
Exhibit 64 (Dkt. No. third parties and
391-63) Plaintiffs
Gould Declaration Seal Plaintiffs
Exhibit 67 (Dkt. No.
391-66)
Gould Declaration Seal Defendants o/b/o
Exhibit 68 (Dkt. No. third parties
391-67)
Gould Declaration Seal Plaintiffs
Exhibit 69 (Dkt. No.
391-68)
Gould Declaration Seal Plaintiffs
Exhibit 70 (Dkt. No.
391-69)
Gould Declaration Seal Defendants o/b/o
Exhibit 72 (Dkt. No. third parties
391-71)
Gould Declaration Redactions Page 124 Defendants
Exhibit 79 (Dkt. No.
391-77)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 183-86 Defendants
Exhibit 80 (Dkt. No.
391-78)
Gould Declaration Seal Plaintiffs
Exhibit 81 (Dkt. No.
391-79)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 29-30 Defendants
Exhibit 85 (Dkt. No.
391-83)
Gould Declaration Redactions Page 3 Defendants
Exhibit 86 (Dkt. No.
391-84)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 1-2 Defendants
Exhibit 87 (Dkt. No.
391-85)
Gould Declaration Redactions Page 2 Defendants
Exhibit 88 (Dkt. No.
391-86)
Gould Declaration Redactions Pages 2-6 Defendants
Exhibit 89 (Dkt. No.
391-87)
Gould Declaration Seal Defendants o/b/o
Exhibit 90 (Dkt. No. third parties
391-88)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10349544. Public record. Not legal advice.