# The State Of Texas v. Google, LLC

> District Court, S.D. New York · February 16, 2022

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10338754

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, S.D. New York
- **Decided:** February 16, 2022
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10338754

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.
IN RE GOOGLE DIGITAL ADVERTISING
ANTITRUST LITIGATION No. 21-MD-3010 (PKC)

This Order Relates To:

THE STATE OF TEXAS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
- against - No. 21-CV-6841 (PKC)
GOOGLE LLC,
Defendant.

[ ] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GOOGLE LLC’S MOTION TO SEAL
LIMITED PERSONAL INFORMATION IN EXHIBIT A TO THE DECLARATION OF
ANDREW J. EWALT IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE LLC’S MOTION TO
DISMISS COUNTS I THROUGH IV OF STATE PLAINTIFFS’
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

P, KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge:
The Court, having reviewed the submissions filed by Defendant Google LLC, determined
that third parties’ privacy interests in maintaining under seal the information sought to be redacted
by Google LLC outweigh any applicable presumption of access, and concluded that the proposed
redactions are narrowly tailored to protect those privacy interests, see Lugosch v. Pyramid Co, of
Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 Qd Cir. 2006), hereby:
ORDERS that the redacted content within the publicly filed Exhibit A to the Declaration
of Andrew J. Ewalt in Support of Defendant Google LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Counts I Through
IV of State Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint shall be maintained under seal.

Mg Fon [ Dre 229) be Ar -td.

SO ORDERED,
Dated: New York, New York
fk bes / é , 2022

He ORABLE P. KEVIN CASTEL
United States District Judge
Southern District of New York

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10338754. Public record. Not legal advice.