# Brown v. National Basketball Association (NBA)

> District Court, S.D. New York · May 12, 2020

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10322883

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, S.D. New York
- **Decided:** May 12, 2020
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10322883

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UDSODCCU MSDENNYT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
KIMBERLY BERNICE BROWN, DATE FILED: 5/12/ 2020
Plaintiff,
-against- 1:19-cv-6434-GHW
NATIONAL BASKETBALL ORDER
ASSOCIATION; TAMERA YOUNG, WBNA
Athlete,
Defendants.
GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:
On May 11, 2020, the Court received the email attached to this order. In the email,
Plaintiff asks, among other things, that the Court “confirm” the transfer of her case to New
Jersey. In response, the Court notes the following.
First, the Court dismissed this case by order on December 30, 2019. Dkt. No. 16.
Judgment was entered on January 2, 2020. Dkt. No. 17. On January 22, 2020, the Court
received Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to appeal the Court’s decision. On January
23, 2020, the Court denied that request. To the Court’s knowledge, Plaintiff never appealed the
Court’s judgment, which became final. Because the Court dismissed the case, and final
judgment was entered with respect to that dismissal, there is no case before the Court. Because
there is no case before the Court, there is no case for the Court to transfer.
Second, the Court has not received a written request from Plaintiff to transfer the case.
The Court does not communicate ex parte with litigants. No member of the Court’s staff told
Plaintiff that her case would be transferred—as described above, there is no case to transfer. To
the extent that Plaintiff wishes to communicate with the Court, she is directed to send a letter to
the Pro Se Intake Unit. Plaintiff is directed not to email the Court’s chambers email box. During
the continuance of the COVID-19 pandemic, pro se filings can be made by email to the email
address designated on the Court’s website.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would
not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an
appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant
demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and Defendants by
first class and certified mail, and note service on the docket.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 12, 2020

United States District Judge

FTroo:m: TWhoeoCdhsr oNnYicSlDes COhf aMmsbBerorswn
Subject: Transfer Case: Brown vs NBA
Date: Monday, May 11, 2020 2:32:40 PM
Previously, I spoke with a clerk for the chamber who stated that my request for venue transfer
would be handled.
I, Kimberly Bernice Brown, am following up to confirm the venue transfer, and indicate that I
am requesting a venue transfer to New Jersey, which is where I reside.
When will I receive confirmation and location of the proper venue?
The case was originally filed Pro Se: Brown vs National Basketball Association, and Tamera
Young.
Kimberly B. Brown

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10322883. Public record. Not legal advice.