# Dalton v. WV Parole Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 22, 2010

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1031662

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 22, 2010
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1031662

## Opinion text

Filed: February 22, 2010

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7694
(2:08-cv-01216)

1STARR DALTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WV PAROLE BOARD; CHRISTIE LOVE; PEGGY J. POPE; BRENDA J.
STUCKEY; JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2,

Defendants - Appellees.

O R D E R

The court amends its opinion filed January 27, 2010,

as follows:

On the cover sheet, the panel information is corrected

to read: “Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.”

For the Court – By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7694

1STARR DALTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WV PAROLE BOARD; CHRISTIE LOVE; PEGGY J. POPE; BRENDA J.
STUCKEY; JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin,
Chief District Judge. (2:08-cv-01216)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

1Starr Dalton, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher James Sears,
SHUMAN, MCCUSKEY & SLICER, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

1Starr Dalton appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Dalton v. W. Va. Parole Bd., No. 2:08-cv-01216 (S.D.W. Va.

Aug. 25, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1031662. Public record. Not legal advice.