# Brown v. State of Maryland

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 22, 2010

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1031279

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 22, 2010
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1031279

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1334

PERRY BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND; DEPUTY PATRICK H. HANDY,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

JOHN DOE,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:07-cv-01956-PJM)

Submitted: January 8, 2010 Decided: January 22, 2010

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Perry Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Corlie McCormick, Jr., David
Reid Moore, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2
PER CURIAM:

Perry Brown appeals the district court’s final order

of judgment entered after a jury returned a defense verdict in

Brown’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Brown v. Maryland,

No. 8:07-cv-01956-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 23, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1031279. Public record. Not legal advice.