# Brown v. Salizar

> District Court, E.D. New York · June 28, 2022

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10308103

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. New York
- **Decided:** June 28, 2022
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10308103

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
X
In the Matter of the Complaint of

ROBERT D. BROWN, as Owner of a 2020 42’
BLUEGAME (HIN: BGM420161920) for Exoneration
from or Limitation of Liability
X
BILLY SALAZAR and INGRID SALAZAR,

Plaintiffs,
ORDER
-against- 20-CV-4629 (JMA) (ARL)

PAT MALLOY WATERFRONT, LLC d/b/a
MALLOY' S WATERFRONT MARINA, MALLOY
ENTERPRISES, INC., COSTELLO'S MARINE
CONTRACTING CORPORATION, and COSTELLO
MARINE SERVICES, INC,

Defendants.
-X
AZRACK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

On January 11, 2022, Billy Salazar and Ingrid Salazar filed a motion to amend their answer
and counterclaim to allege unseaworthiness. On June 2, 2022, Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay
issued a Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”) which recommends that the motion be granted.
In reviewing a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court must “make a de
novo determination of those portions of the report or . . . recommendations to which
objection[s][are] made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown v. Ebert, No. 05–CV–5579,
2006 WL 3851152, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2006). The court “may accept, reject, or modify, in
whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(C). Those portions of a report and recommendation to which there is no specific
reasoned objection are reviewed for clear error. See Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc., 249 F.R.D. 48, 51
(E.D.N.Y. 2008).
To date, no objections have been filed to the R&R and the deadline for filing any such
objections has passed. I have reviewed Judge Lindsay’s R&R for clear error, and finding none, I
adopt the R&R in its entirety as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, the motion to amend is
GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 28, 2022
Central Islip, New York

/s/ (JMA)
JOAN M. AZRACK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10308103. Public record. Not legal advice.