# Brown v. Quattlebaum

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 22, 2009

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1030451

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 22, 2009
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1030451

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7254

VERNON SAMUEL BROWN, a/k/a Vernon S. Brown,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ANTONIO QUATTLEBAUM, Detention Officer,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (9:08-cv-02225-GRA)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vernon Samuel Brown, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson,
II, Joel Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Vernon Samuel Brown appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)

complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Brown v. Quattlebaum, No. 9:08-cv-02225-GRA (D.S.C. Mar.

13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1030451. Public record. Not legal advice.
