# Farley v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 23, 2009

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1030416

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 23, 2009
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1030416

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1585

DAVID P. FARLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LILLIE MAE BROWN; BOB BISHOP; SITE MANAGER, CREST STREET,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:06-cv-00209-F)

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 23, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and
HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David P. Farley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

David P. Farley appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion filed in a closed case. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Farley v. Brown, No.

5:06-cv-00209-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1030416. Public record. Not legal advice.