# Dr. Gerald R. Finkel, as Chairman of The Joint Industry Board of The Electrical Industry v. Potenza Electrical Corp.

> District Court, E.D. New York · January 14, 2020

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10303710

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. New York
- **Decided:** January 14, 2020
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10303710

## Opinion text

FILED
IN CLERK'S OFFICE
US DISTRICT COURT E.D.NY.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT te JAN AM 2020 ok
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
EERE Ee TE
; BROOKLYN OFFICE
DR. GERALD R. FINKEL, as Chairman of the Joint *
Industry Board of the Electrical Industry, : .
Pavitioner : MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHNIOHET _ AND ORDER
against - : 19-CV-00486 (AMD) (RML)
POTENZA ELECTRICAL CORP., ef al, :
Respondents. .
eee neneneneneneneeeee OX
M. DONNELLY, United States District Judge:
On January 24, 2019, the petitioner brought this action seeking confirmation of an
arbitration award and asking the Court to award certain additional damages and fees against the
respondents pursuant to section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 (“ERISA”), codified as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3) and section 301 of the Labor
Management Relations Act of 1947, codified as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 185. (ECF Nos. 1, 4.)
Neither respondent answered or otherwise moved with respect to the petition.
On March 1, 2019, I referred the petition to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy for a report
and recommendation. On March 4, 2019, the petitioner moved for summary judgment on the
unopposed petition. (ECF No. 10.) On November 26, 2019, Judge Levy recommended that I
grant the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment and confirm the award. (ECF No. 12.)
Judge Levy also recommended that damages be awarded as set forth in his report and
recommendation. (/d.) No objections have been filed to the report and recommendation, and
the time for doing so has passed.

A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). To accept those
portions of the report and recommendation to which no timely objection has been made, “a
district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Jarvis
v. N. Am. Globex Fund L.P., 823 F. Supp. 2d 161, 163 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) (internal quotation
omitted).
I have reviewed Magistrate Judge Levy’s thoughtful report and recommendation and find
no error. Accordingly, I adopt the report and recommendation in its entirety and order that the
arbitration award be confirmed and that damages be awarded as set forth therein, for a total
judgment of $555,353.79:
(1) Respondent Potenza Electrical Corp. be held liable for the total award amount of
$552,570.29, plus pre-judgment interest on the unpaid contributions accruing at a
rate of $61.54 per day from the date of the award through the date of entry of
judgment, attorney’s fees of $2,308.50, and costs of $475: and
(2) Respondent Michael Tarantino be held jointly and severally liable with Potenza for
$5,534.63 of the total award amount.

SO ORDERED.
s/Ann M. Donnelly
AnnM Donnelly
United States District Judge
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
January 13, 2020

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10303710. Public record. Not legal advice.