# J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Gonzalez

> District Court, E.D. New York · September 30, 2019

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10303168

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. New York
- **Decided:** September 30, 2019
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10303168

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------------X
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ADOPTING REPORT AND
Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATION
18-CV-2319 (RRM) (RER)
- against -

MARILYN GONZALEZ AND RINCONCITO
DOMINICANO, LLC,

Defendants.
-------------------------------------------------------------------X

ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, United States District Judge.

Before the Court are objections submitted by the parties to the Report and
Recommendation (R&R) of Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, recommending that the Court
grant defendant Marilyn Gonzaelz’s motion to dismiss, and deny leave to amend. Plaintiff J&J
Sports Productions, Inc. objected to the R&R. Having conducted a review of the full record and
the applicable law pursuant to the principles below, the Court overrules plaintiff’s objections,
and adopts Judge Reyes’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
In reviewing a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court must “make a de
novo determination of those portions of the report or . . . recommendations to which
objection[s][are] made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown v. Ebert, No. 05–CV–5579,
2006 WL 3851152, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2006). The court “may accept, reject, or modify, in
whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(C). Those portions of the Report to which there is no specific reasoned objection are
reviewed for clear error. See Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc., 249 F.R.D. 48, 51 (E.D.N.Y. 2008).
The Court has considered all of plaintiff’s objections de novo, and has reviewed the remainder of
Judge Reyes’s recommendations to which the plaintiff did not object and finding no clear error,
adopts those findings.
As such, the Court affirms and adopts the thorough and well-reasoned Report and
Recommendation in its entirety as the opinion of the Court.
CONCLUSION
Defendant Marilyn Gonzalez’s motion to dismiss the complaint is granted, and all claims
against her are dismissed. Plaintiff is denied leave to amend.

This action is recommitted to Magistrate Judge Reyes for supervision of all remaining
pre-trial matters.
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order
to the pro se defendant Marilyn Gonzalez and note the mailing on the docket.
SO ORDERED.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York Roslynn R. Mauskopf
September 29, 2019
____________________________________
ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF
United States District Judge

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10303168. Public record. Not legal advice.