# Adams v. Brown

> District Court, D. Nevada · April 5, 2024

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10302217

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, D. Nevada
- **Decided:** April 5, 2024
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10302217

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES CO URT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAR 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
In re: BRANDON ADAMS. No. 24-936 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
____________________________
D.C. No. 2:23-cv-01923-CDS-MDC
District of Nevada,
BRANDON ADAMS, Las Vegas

ORDER
Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS
VEGAS,

Respondent,

ELIZABETH BROWN; RORY WUNSCH,

Real Parties in Interest.

Before: FRIEDLAND, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the
extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir.
2021) (“To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh
the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.”); Bauman v.
U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition for a writ
of mandamus, as supplemented, is denied.
No further filings will be entertained in this closed case.
DENIED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10302217. Public record. Not legal advice.