# Brown v. Giether

> District Court, D. Nevada · March 21, 2024

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10301991

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, D. Nevada
- **Decided:** March 21, 2024
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10301991

## Opinion text

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
TRACEY L. BROWN, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01182-RFB-DJA
4
Plaintiffs, ORDER
5 v.

6 GIETHER, et al.,

7 Defendants.

8
9 This action began with a pro se civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
10 1983 by Plaintiffs Tracey L. Brown and Tony O. Brown, who are both state prisoners.
11 Each Plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 6,
12 12). Based on the financial information provided, the Court finds that neither Plaintiff can
13 prepay the full filing fee in this matter, and the Court grants each Plaintiff’s motion to
14 proceed in forma pauperis. Each Plaintiff will be required to pay his own $350 filing fee
15 when he has funds available.1
16
1 The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) directs that “if a prisoner brings a civil action
17 or files an appeal in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount
of a filing fee.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The Eleventh Circuit held in Hubbard v. Haley that
18 this language plainly requires “each prisoner proceeding [in forma pauperis] to pay the
full filing fee” in a multi-plaintiff action, and to the extent that Federal Rule of Civil
19
Procedure 20 conflicts with the PLRA, “the statute repeals the Rule.” 262 F.3d 1194,
20 1197–98 (11th Cir. 2001). The Eleventh Circuit thus affirmed the district court’s decision
dismissing the action, finding that each plaintiff was required to file a separate complaint
21 and pay a separate filing fee. Id. at 1198.
The Seventh Circuit took a different approach in Boriboune v. Berge, concluding
22 that the PLRA neither repealed nor modified Rule 20, it found that Hubbard got one point
right: “one price of forma pauperis status is each prisoner’s responsibility to pay the full
23
fee in installments (or in advance, if § 1915(g) applies), no matter how many other
24 plaintiffs join the complaint.” 391 F.3d 852, 855–56 (7th Cir. 2004). The Seventh Circuit
concluded that, “[i]nstead of adopting a no-joinder rule, the district court should have
25 ensured that each of the four prisoners was assessed one full filing fee under §
1915(b)(1).” Id. at 856. In Hagan v. Rogers, the Third Circuit followed the Seventh Circuit’s
26 approach. 570 F.3d 146, 154–56 (3d Cir. 2009).
The Ninth Circuit has not yet addressed this issue, but jurists in this district have
27
followed the Seventh Circuit’s approach in Boriboune, permitting prisoners to join their
28 claims in a single action if Rule 20’s requirements are met but requiring each plaintiff to
1 The Court entered a screening order on March 31, 2023. (ECF No. 26). The
2 screening order imposed a stay, and the Court entered a subsequent order in which the
3 parties were assigned to mediation by a court-appointed mediator. (ECF Nos. 26, 31).
4 The parties have participated in a mediation session, but they did not reach a settlement.
5 (ECF No. 46).
6 For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:
7 1. Plaintiff Tracey L. Brown’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF
8 No. 12) is GRANTED. Tracey Brown shall not be required to pay an initial installment of
9 the filing fee. In the event that this action is dismissed, the full filing fee must still be paid
10 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
11 2. Tracey Brown is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without the
12 necessity of prepayment of any additional fees or costs or the giving of security therefor.
13 3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform
14 Act, the Nevada Department of Corrections will forward payments from the account of
15 Tracey L. Brown, #67358 to the Clerk of the United States District Court, District of
16 Nevada, 20% of the preceding month's deposits (in months that the account exceeds
17 $10.00) until the full $350 filing fee has been paid for this action. The Clerk of the Court
18 will send a copy of this order to the Finance Division of the Clerk’s Office. The Clerk will
19 send a copy of this order to the attention of Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada
20 Department of Corrections at formapauperis@doc.nv.gov.
21 4. Plaintiff Tony O. Brown’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No.
22 6) is GRANTED. Tony Brown shall not be required to pay an initial installment of the filing
23 fee. In the event that this action is dismissed, the full filing fee must still be paid pursuant
24 to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
25 ///

26 pay his or her own filing fee. See, e.g., Lyons v. Baca, Case No. 3:15-cv-00126-MMD-
VPC, 2016 WL 845312, at *3–4 (D. Nev. Mar. 1, 2016); Meadows v. Lombardo, Case No.
27
2:23-cv-00755-RFB-MDC (ECF No. 7 at 2-4). The Court will follow Boriboune’s approach
28 and allow the Plaintiffs to proceed together but require each Plaintiff to pay his own filing
1 5. Tony Brown is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without the
2 necessity of prepayment of any additional fees or costs or the giving of security therefor.
3 6. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform
4 Act, the Nevada Department of Corrections will forward payments from the account of
5 Tony O. Brown, #69493 to the Clerk of the United States District Court, District of
6 Nevada, 20% of the preceding month's deposits (in months that the account exceeds
7 $10.00) until the full $350 filing fee has been paid for this action. The Clerk of the Court
8 will send a copy of this order to the Finance Division of the Clerk’s Office. The Clerk will
9 send a copy of this order to the attention of Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada
10 Department of Corrections at formapauperis@doc.nv.gov.
11 7. The Clerk of the Court shall electronically SERVE a copy of this order and
12 a copy of Plaintiffs’ complaint (ECF No. 27) on the Office of the Attorney General of the
13 State of Nevada by adding the Attorney General of the State of Nevada to the docket
14 sheet. This does not indicate acceptance of service.
15 8. Service must be perfected within ninety (90) days from the date of this order
16 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
17 9. Subject to the findings of the screening order (ECF No. 26), within twenty-
18 one (21) days of the date of entry of this order, the Attorney General’s Office shall file a
19 notice advising the Court and Plaintiffs of: (a) the names of the defendants for whom it
20 accepts service; (b) the names of the defendants for whom it does not accept service,
21 and (c) the names of the defendants for whom it is filing the last-known-address
22 information under seal. As to any of the named defendants for whom the Attorney
23 General’s Office cannot accept service, the Office shall file, under seal, but shall not serve
24 the inmate Plaintiff the last known address(es) of those defendant(s) for whom it has such
25 information. If the last known address of the defendant(s) is a post office box, the Attorney
26 General's Office shall attempt to obtain and provide the last known physical address(es).
27 10. If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), Plaintiffs
28 shall file a motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a
4|| summons, and specifying a full name and address for the defendant(s). For the
2\| defendant(s) as to which the Attorney General has not provided last-known-address
information, Plaintiffs shall provide the full name and address for the defendant(s).
4 11. If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named
5|| defendant(s), such defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the
complaint (ECF No. 27) within sixty (60) days from the date of this order.
7 12. Plaintiffs shall serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been
entered by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other
g|} document submitted for consideration by the Court. If Plaintiffs electronically file a
document with the Court’s electronic-filing system, no certificate of service is required.
11|| Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1)(B); Nev. Loc. R. IC 4-1(b); Nev. Loc. R. 5-1. However, if Plaintiffs
mail the document to the Court, Plaintiffs shall include with the original document
43|| submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the
44|| document was mailed to the defendants or counsel for the defendants. If counsel has
15|| entered a notice of appearance, Plaintiffs shall direct service to the individual attorney
named in the notice of appearance, at the physical or electronic address stated therein.
|| The Court may disregard any document received by a district judge or magistrate judge
48|| which has not been filed with the Clerk, and any document received by a district judge,
49|| magistrate judge, or the Clerk which fails to include a certificate showing proper service
20|| when required.
21 13. This case is no longer stayed.
22
33 DATED this 20" day of March ™ QOD
35 UNITED STATES MASISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10301991. Public record. Not legal advice.