# Holloman v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 24, 2009

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1030181

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 24, 2009
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1030181

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6510

LENNELL HOLLOMAN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JUDGE BROWN, Judge,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-00020-RBS-TEM)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 24, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lennell Holloman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Lennell Holloman appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that

this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

for the reasons stated by the district court. Holloman v.

Brown, No. 2:09-cv-00020-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 21, 2009;

entered Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1030181. Public record. Not legal advice.