# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 5, 2009

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1028772

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 5, 2009
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1028772

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

OSCAR BROWN, JR., a/k/a Grip,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (7:02-cr-00014-BR-1)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 5, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oscar Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf
A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Oscar Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Brown, No. 7:02-cr-

00014-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1028772. Public record. Not legal advice.