# Brown v. American Institute for Research

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 3, 2009

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1028101

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 3, 2009
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1028101

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1265

JULLIAN L. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES,
INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge.
(8:06-cv-02935-RWT)

Submitted: January 29, 2009 Decided: March 3, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome E. Clair, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Natalie O.
Ludaway, Matthew H. Goodman, LEFTWICH & LUDAWAY, LLC,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Jullian L. Brown appeals the district court’s orders

granting summary judgment in favor of the American Institutes

for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, Inc., and denying her

motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Brown v. Am. Inst. for Research in the Behavioral

Sciences, Inc., No. 8:06-cv-02935-RWT (D. Md. Oct. 1, 2007

& Jan. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1028101. Public record. Not legal advice.