# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 24, 2009

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1027986

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 24, 2009
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1027986

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7730

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHNNY MACK BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, Chief
District Judge. (3:94-cr-00027-jpj-1)

Submitted: January 30, 2009 Decided: February 24, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Mack Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Johnny Mack Brown appeals the district court’s order

granting his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Brown, No. 3:94-cr-

00027-jpj-1 (W.D. Va. July 30, 2008). We deny the motion for

appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1027986. Public record. Not legal advice.