# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 26, 2009

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1027932

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 26, 2009
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1027932

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8204

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CARL LEE BROWN, a/k/a Cuz,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District
Judge. (1:97-cr-00441-MJG-1)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Lee Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Carl Lee Brown appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Brown, No.

1:97-cr-00441-MJG-1 (D. Md. Sept. 11 & 29, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1027932. Public record. Not legal advice.