# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 26, 2009

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1027782

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 26, 2009
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1027782

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8467

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:06-cr-00582-RBH-1)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 26, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Michael Brown appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for downward departure. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order. United States v. Brown, No. 4:06-cr-

00582-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1027782. Public record. Not legal advice.