# Setliff v. Va. Parole Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 16, 2009

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1027607

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 16, 2009
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1027607

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7654

MORTON R. SETLIFF,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

VA. PAROLE BOARD, Va DOC Parole Board; GOV. TIM KAINE, Va.
Governor,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:08-cv-00310-MSD-JEB)

Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 16, 2009

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit
Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Morton R. Setliff, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Morton R. Setliff appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Setliff v. Va. Parole Bd., No. 2:08-cv-00310-MSD-JEB

(E.D. Va. filed Aug. 4, 2008; entered Aug. 5, 2008). We deny

Setliff’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1027607. Public record. Not legal advice.