# Hancock v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 25, 2008

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1026028

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 25, 2008
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1026028

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6662

PRESTON HANCOCK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WENDY BROWN, Case Manager Court Legal,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:08-cv-00014-HEH)

Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 25, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Preston Hancock, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Preston Hancock appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his complaint for failing to return a

consent to the collection of fees form. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Hancock v. Brown, No.

3:08-cv-00014-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1026028. Public record. Not legal advice.