# DJ v. Google, Inc.

> District Court, W.D. North Carolina · December 16, 2020

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10256539

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, W.D. North Carolina
- **Decided:** December 16, 2020
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10256539

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:20-cv-645-FDW-DCK

DJ, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. )
) ORDER
GOOGLE, INC., et al., )
)
Defendants. )
____________________________________ )
THIS MATTER is before the Court on its November 30, 2020, Order, (Doc. No. 3).
Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint and an Application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc.
Nos. 1, 2). However, the Application and Complaint were incomplete and insufficient to pass
initial review. The Court denied the Application and dismissed the Complaint without prejudice.
(Doc. No. 3). The Court granted Plaintiff the opportunity to pay the filing fee or file an Amended
Application, and file an Amended Complaint within 14 days. (Id.). The Court cautioned Plaintiff
that the failure to do so would result in this action’s dismissal without prejudice and without further
notice. (Id.). No Amended Application or Amended Complaint has been filed to date.
Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s November 30, 2020 Order and, therefore,
this action will be dismissed without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (“If the plaintiff fails to
prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the
action or any claim against it.”); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 631-33 (1962) (although
Rule 41(b) does not expressly provide for sua sponte dismissal, a district court has the inherent
power to dismiss a case for lack of prosecution or violation of a court order).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1
1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with
the Court’s November 30, 2020 Order.
2. The Clerk of this Court is directed to terminate this action.
Signed: December 16, 2020

Frank D. Whitney é
United States District Judge tg □

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10256539. Public record. Not legal advice.