# Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

> District Court, W.D. North Carolina · November 26, 2019

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10255182

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, W.D. North Carolina
- **Decided:** November 26, 2019
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10255182

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
DOCKET NO: 3:18-CV-00253-MOC

DANYELLE BROWN, a/k/a )
DONYELLE BROWN, )
)
Plaintiff, )
) ORDER
vs. )
)
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., )
)
Defendant. )

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Plaintiff’s
Failure to Attend Her Depositions and Failure to Prosecute (Doc. No. 24). On October 21, 2019,
this Court ordered Plaintiff to respond to this motion, explaining why the Court should not dismiss
her claim for failure to attend her depositions and for failure to prosecute. In that order, the Court
emphatically stated that “[i]f Plaintiff fail[ed] to respond within fourteen days, the Court [would]
dismiss this matter for failure to prosecute and for failure to appear for the depositions.” (Doc.
No. 28 at 2). Nevertheless, Plaintiff failed to respond.
This Court may order sanctions, including dismissal of an action, where a “party . . . fails,
after being served with proper notice, to appear for that person’s deposition.” Fed. R. Civ. P.
37(d)(1)(A)(i); see, e.g., Davis v. United States, 767 F. App’x 396, 397 (4th Cir. 2018). Moreover,
courts may dismiss a claim where “the plaintiff fails to prosecute.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see, e.g.,
Attkisson v. Holder, 925 F.3d 606, 625 (4th Cir.), as amended (June 10, 2019). Because Plaintiff
has failed to attend her depositions and has failed to prosecute this case, the matter is dismissed.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for
Plaintiff's Failure to Attend Her Depositions and Failure to Prosecute (Doc. No.
24) is GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED.
Signed: November 26, 2019

ff bcd —
TORE be
Max O. Cogburn i &
United States District Judge Height

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10255182. Public record. Not legal advice.