# GOINES v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC

> District Court, M.D. North Carolina · December 14, 2021

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10253902

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, M.D. North Carolina
- **Decided:** December 14, 2021
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10253902

## Opinion text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

AARON GOINS, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. ) 1:19CV489
)
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., et al., )
)
Defendants. )
)

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LORETTA C. BIGGS, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion for Confirmation of Arbitration Award by Defendant
TitleMax of South Carolina, Inc. (“TitleMax”). (ECF No. 134.) The motion requests that the
Court confirm the Final Award issued by JAMS Arbitration (“Final Award”) pursuant to 9
U.S.C. § 9 and enter judgment on behalf of TitleMax against Plaintiffs Teresa Dixon, Jason
Lane, and Cassandra Miller consistent with the Final Award. (Id.) Plaintiff has not opposed
the motion.
Courts are divided on whether a federal court may confirm an arbitration award where
there is no “live controversy between the parties regarding the award necessitating judicial
enforcement,” and the Fourth Circuit has not resolved the issue in this circuit. See Brown &
Pipkins, LLC v. SEIU, 846 F.3d 716, 729 n.2 (4th Cir. 2017). However, the Fourth Circuit has
recognized that “[a] confirmation proceeding under 9 U.S.C. § 9 is intended to be summary:
confirmation can only be denied if an award has been corrected, vacated, or modified in
accordance with the Federal Arbitration Act.” Taylor v. Nelson, 788 F.2d 220, 225 (4th Cir.
1986). Plaintiff has not asserted such claim concerning the arbitration award at issue here.
Therefore, the Court will grant TitleMax’s unopposed motion. See Goins v. TitleMax of Virginia,
Inc., No. 1:19CV489, 2021 WL 3856150, at *1–2 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2021).

ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion for Confirmation of Arbitration
Award, (ECF No. 134), is GRANTED.
Judgment dismissing claims will be entered simultaneously.
This, the 14th day of December 2021.

/s/ Loretta C. Biggs
United States District Judge

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10253902. Public record. Not legal advice.