# Diggs v. Barr

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 24, 2007 · 251 F. App'x 821

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1024085

## Case

- **Full name:** Shun J. DIGGS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Ronald BARR, Defendant—Appellee, and Officer Gaston; Sergeant Brown, Defendants
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 24, 2007
- **Citations:** 251 F. App'x 821
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Michael, Motz, Gregory
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1024085

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6619

SHUN J. DIGGS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD BARR,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

OFFICER GASTON; SERGEANT BROWN,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
District Judge. (3:06-cv-00329)

Submitted: October 10, 2007 Decided: October 24, 2007

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shun J. Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Barr, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Shun J. Diggs appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Diggs v. Barr, No.

3:06-cv-00329 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 2006; Mar. 1, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1024085. Public record. Not legal advice.