# Clark v. Sutton

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 16, 2007 · 251 F. App'x 165

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1024002

## Case

- **Full name:** Orlando Rapheal CLARK, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Ernest R. SUTTON; Curtis E. Brown, Defendants—Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 16, 2007
- **Citations:** 251 F. App'x 165
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Michael, Shedd, Hamilton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1024002

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6222

ORLANDO RAPHEAL CLARK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ERNEST R. SUTTON; CURTIS E. BROWN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (5:05-ct-00724-H)

Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 16, 2007

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlando Rapheal Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Orlando Rapheal Clark appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v.

Sutton, No. 5:05-ct-00724-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1024002. Public record. Not legal advice.