# Brown v. Dotson

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 19, 2007 · 242 F. App'x 19

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1023812

## Case

- **Full name:** James Benjamin BROWN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Sam DOTSON, in His Individual Capacity; Chris Surratt, in His Individual Capacity; James Johnson, in His Individual Capacity; Curtis Sturgill, in His Individual Capacity; Sid Harkleroad, in His Individual Capacity; Boyd Bennett, in His Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 19, 2007
- **Citations:** 242 F. App'x 19
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Gregory, Duncan, Wilkins
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1023812

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6770

JAMES BENJAMIN BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SAM DOTSON, in his individual capacity; CHRIS
SURRATT, in his individual capacity; JAMES
JOHNSON, in his individual capacity; CURTIS
STURGILL, in his individual capacity; SID
HARKLEROAD, in his individual capacity; BOYD
BENNETT, in his individual and official
capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
District Judge. (1:07-cv-00114-03-MU)

Submitted: September 13, 2007 Decided: September 19, 2007

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Benjamin Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

James Benjamin Brown appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Dotson, No. 1:07-

cv-00114-03-MU (W.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1023812. Public record. Not legal advice.