# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 19, 2007 · 241 F. App'x 987

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1023800

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Tony Anthony BROWN, Defendant—Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 19, 2007
- **Citations:** 241 F. App'x 987
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Gregory, Duncan, Wilkins
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1023800

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6737

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TONY ANTHONY BROWN,

Defendant -Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:98-cr-00037-F; 5:05-cv-00123-F)

Submitted: September 13, 2007 Decided: September 19, 2007

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony Anthony Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Tony Anthony Brown appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for reduction of

sentence and his motion captioned an “unopposed motion for amended

judgment and commitment order.” We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, Nos. 5:98-

cr-00037-F; 5:05-cv-00123-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1023800. Public record. Not legal advice.