# Belton v. Chester Lancaster Disabilities & Special Needs Board, Inc.

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 27, 2007 · 234 F. App'x 173

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1023202

## Case

- **Full name:** Lynda BELTON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CHESTER LANCASTER DISABILITIES AND SPECIAL NEEDS BOARD, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 27, 2007
- **Citations:** 234 F. App'x 173
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Wilkinson, Traxler, Duncan
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1023202

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1221

LYNDA BELTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHESTER LANCASTER DISABILITIES AND SPECIAL
NEEDS BOARD, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(0:05-cv-01649-MBS)

Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 27, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lynda Belton, Appellant Pro Se. Vance J. Bettis, Reyburn Williams
Lominack, III, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Lynda Belton appeals the district court’s order adopting

the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and granting

defendant’s summary judgment motion on her racial discrimination

and harassment claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17

(2000), and dismissing without prejudice her state law claims for

breach of contract, breach of contract with fraudulent means, and

wrongful discharge. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Belton v. Chester Lancaster Disabilities

and Special Needs Bd., Inc., No. 0:05-cv-01649-MBS (D.S.C. Feb. 14,

2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1023202. Public record. Not legal advice.