# Brown v. Doctor Reese

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 4, 2007 · 223 F. App'x 221

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1022248

## Case

- **Full name:** Marguerite G. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nurse BRENDA; Nurse Liala; Doctor Reese, Defendants-Appellees, and Rappahannock Regional Jail; Rappahannock Regional Jail Staff, Defendants
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 4, 2007
- **Citations:** 223 F. App'x 221
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Mótz, Traxler, Duncan
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1022248

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7741

MARGUERITE G. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NURSE BRENDA; NURSE LIALA; DOCTOR REESE,

Defendants - Appellees,
and

RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL; RAPPAHANNOCK
REGIONAL JAIL STAFF,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:05-cv-00029-GBL)

Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marguerite G. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney,
RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Marguerite G. Brown appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v.

Doctor Reese, No. 1:05-cv-00029-GBL (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2006). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1022248. Public record. Not legal advice.