# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 6, 2007

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1022197

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 6, 2007
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1022197

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEROME D. BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (7:03-cr-00071; 7:03-cr-00101; 7:03-cr-00122)

Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 6, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome D. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. John L. Brownlee, United States
Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Jerome D. Brown appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a reduction in sentence filed pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3742. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See United States v. Brown, No. 7:03-cr-00101

(W.D. Va. Dec. 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1022197. Public record. Not legal advice.