# Grantham v. Anderson

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 27, 2007 · 219 F. App'x 308

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1021950

## Case

- **Full name:** Marvin Lamont GRANTHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wilbert E. ANDERSON; Jack Earl Best, Wayne County Board of Commissioner; Sheriff Winders, Sheriff of Wayne County Jail; Captain Tadlock, at Wayne County Jail; Efton Saser, Wayne County Board of Commissioner; John Bell, Wayne County Board of Commissioner; J.D. Evans, Wayne County Board of Commissioner; Bud Gray, Wayne County Board of Commissioner; Atlas Price, DefendantsAppellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 27, 2007
- **Citations:** 219 F. App'x 308
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Niemeyer, Williams, Duncan
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1021950

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7237

MARVIN LAMONT GRANTHAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILBERT E. ANDERSON; JACK EARL BEST, Wayne
County Board of Commissioner; SHERIFF WINDERS,
Sheriff of Wayne County Jail; CAPTAIN TADLOCK,
at Wayne County Jail; EFTON SASER, Wayne
County Board of Commissioner; JOHN BELL, Wayne
County Board of Commissioner; J. D. EVANS,
Wayne County Board of Commissioner; BUD GRAY,
Wayne County Board of Commissioner; ATLAS
PRICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (5:05-ct-00541-H)

Submitted: February 14, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin Lamont Grantham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Marvin Lamont Grantham appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the

reasons stated by the district court. Grantham v. Anderson, No.

5:05-ct-00541-H (E.D.N.C. July 5, 2006) . We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1021950. Public record. Not legal advice.